If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
I have lowers that were purchased years before the 2017 ban. Am I legal to register them as completed rifles? I have reciepts for the purchases for both.
Under Healy, all pre-94 ARs are illegal assault weapons. She has decided at this time not to prosecute the owners of rifles purchased before 7/20. With your lower, if it was registered when you bought it, or if you have a sales reciept - you should be good to go. Otherwise, you have no way to prove you aren’t in violation.
Len has posted a pdf from her office stating a lower , which in this case was going to be an sbr , bought pre 7/20 can be registered and is allowed. To the best of my recollection.Uh. . . citation or logic please??
I'm with you on post-94 ARs, but Pre-94 guns are grandfathered.
Uh. . . citation or logic please??
I'm with you on post-94 ARs, but Pre-94 guns are grandfathered.
Len has posted a pdf from her office stating a lower , which in this case was going to be an sbr , bought pre 7/20 can be registered and is allowed. To the best of my recollection.
When you buy a lower, a federal form is filled out, right? Not the FA-10 but something for BATF IIRC. Anyone know if its possible to get a copy of that form for something purchased in 2008 to prove my lower was in state then?
thanks
Are you referring to the 4473?
I'm so, so, soooo fvcking glad to be out of the God forsaken state of Massachusetts.
I'll be over at my local FFL this afternoon picking up my next three AR build recievers.
When you buy a lower, a federal form is filled out, right? Not the FA-10 but something for BATF IIRC. Anyone know if its possible to get a copy of that form for something purchased in 2008 to prove my lower was in state then?
thanks
I have lowers that were purchased years before the 2017 ban. Am I legal to register them as completed rifles? I have reciepts for the purchases for both.
I was under the impression that if the ffl was still valid, not expired or given up, the books stayed with the ffl owner named and not turned in unless the ffl was not renewed or just turned in with the shop closure. no?When a FFL shuts their doors they ship all their info to the ATF
I'm so, so, soooo fvcking glad to be out of the God forsaken state of Massachusetts.
I'll be over at my local FFL this afternoon picking up my next three AR build recievers.
The licensee (the person holding the FFL the shop operates as) retains the bound book for, iirc, 20 years. The bb is NOT sent to the ATF when the shop closes. Only if they explicitly ask/require them.
I was under the impression that if the ffl was still valid, not expired or given up, the books stayed with the ffl owner named and not turned in unless the ffl was not renewed or just turned in with the shop closure. no?
Has anyone explored adding a fixed mag mod to a lower? Super gay but it's at least something. About CompMag
That is not correct.
When a licensee gives up his license, the licnesee must deliver to the ATF all the 4473s and bound books, multiple sale reports and all loss/theft reports. ATF is not allowed to digitize them or create a database from the data within.
Discontinue Being a Federal Firearms Licensee (FFL) | Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives
Some verbal info from a ATF examiner is about as good as you would get from the UPS driver. I was once told that a 07 could only sell what they made. Go by what's in the regs only. Jack.Your correction is incorrect. The licensee retains the records. At least, according to the ATF rep as told to me in person.
Your correction is incorrect. The licensee retains the records. At least, according to the ATF rep as told to me in person.