If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Be sure to enter the NES/MFS May Giveaway ***Canik METE SFX***
I'd say it would be more of a problem to not feel anything when you take the life of something.
Just one of those things about me - I don't 'like' killing anything.
I feel bad when I don't dispatch them quickly. I don't shoot to make the animal suffer.
Tom Gresham spoke about this on GunTalk the other day. He went on a rant about hunters that have a goal of taking game at long distances. His thought on it was that it took the "hunt" (stalking, getting as close as possible, and taking a clean shot) out of hunting and reduced the animal to nothing more than a target.
I have a problem when folks say that "their way" of hunting is the only ethical way. For example, I've heard some folks say: "Bow hunting is unethical because more animals get wounded instead of killed."
Tom never said his opinion was the only ethical way. He said it was his personal opinion. That said.. since when did bow hunting only wound an animal? IMPO their is a big difference between bow hunting and trying to get the farthest shot you can for bragging rights.
It has been argued by some that bow hunting has a larger ratio of wound to kill than hunting with a gun. Please note that I have hunted with a bow and I do not think that bow hunting is unethical. But other people do, and that is exactly what Gresham is saying -- "my way of hunting is good; that way of hunting is bad."
I understand that is his personal opinion. Lots of non-hunters have the personal opinion that bow hunting is unethical. Or that hunting with bait is unethical. Or that using scents is unethical. Or that hunting in an enclosed preserve is unethical. Or that driving deer is unethical. Or that hunting with dogs is unethical. And those personal opinions end up changing hunting laws and screwing us in the process.
While I think you should hunt at a distance that enhances the chances of a clean kill, that distance for me is different than for someone else. Is 100 yards ethical? How about 200? 300? 400? Who am I to say that hunter X is hunting at a distance that is unethical?
I don't think Gresham is doing anyone a favor by running down other hunters who are hunting the way that they prefer.
The way I took his comment was that he personally finds it unethical to take a long shot just for the challenge of taking a long shot (he was talking about 1,000 yards +) and that you should always take the cleanest shot you can.
I feel bad when I don't dispatch them quickly. I don't shoot to make the animal suffer.
I don't see how I misinterpreted anything. It's the "I find it unethical to <insert here>" that I have a problem with. That's very different from saying "I don't like to hunt that way. I enjoy the stalk and getting close to the animal." He's saying "that way of hunting is bad; my way is good."
Anti's then run with it. Guess why trapping was banned in MA? Hunting in enclosures has been banned in 20 states, because people have the opinion that it is unethical: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canned_huntWhether something is ethical or moral is a matter of opinion and differs based on who you are, what your religion is, and where you live. Who cares if he says "I don't like to hunt that way" or "I think it's unethical for people to hunt that way". He's not saying people should be forbidden from hunting that way...he just said that his opinion was that it was unethical.
Whether something is ethical or moral is a matter of opinion and differs based on who you are, what your religion is, and where you live.
The first one is the tough one, after that it gets easier. Never kill just for fun or just to waste a life. If the killing has a purpose, there should be no guilt. Been hunting since I was a kid.
I shot a rat once with my 45 and just wounded it then missed my follow up shot and stop it dead on the 3rd shot. I felt terrible once I remember I just used up $3.75 of good carry ammo on a rat.
I shot a rat once with my 45 and just wounded it then missed my follow up shot and stop it dead on the 3rd shot. I felt terrible once I remember I just used up $3.75 of good carry ammo on a rat.
After reading this thread, I just went to the police station and turned in my firearms, bow and arrows, slingshot, and ant bait traps.
I'm now going into a corner and gwieve for all the widdle creatures in the fowest we have injured or murdered. Bye....
Geebuz, what a bunch of skirts! It's no wonder this Nancy of a State is the way it is. Man up and grow a sack!
I realize that this is MA, but geez....suck it up!
Sad about a porcupine....really? How would you feel if it unloaded on a pet or a kid?
Do you also grieve over dead chipmunks, mice, rats, etc.? All very destructive and virtually begging to be 'taken out'!