If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Be sure to enter the NES/MFS May Giveaway ***Canik METE SFX***
Since when is GOAL the "mass chapter" of the NRA. What dumb reporting.
Its about time.
You must be the guy whose copy of the case has NRA all over the first page. AssYeah, sometimes people really need to take their own advice. In this case, you should probably read the full headline and the first page of the case.
But as you said, you can't fix stupid.
shh ,You must be the guy whose copy of the case has NRA all over the first page. Ass
Thank you to COMM2A, GOAL And the NRA!
I just hope this doesn't take 3 years
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sadly, I think that's close to how long it would take. Probably longer.
Baker’s spokeswoman said the governor “supports the Second Amendment to our Constitution and Massachusetts’ gun laws, including the ban on assault weapons, and the administration generally does not comment on pending lawsuits.”
Does that make it clear to anyone still carrying Charlie's water?
He needs to be crushed in an epic manner in 2018.
And the Republicans need to know who and why.
NO MORE RINOS
Baker’s spokeswoman said the governor “supports the Second Amendment to our Constitution and Massachusetts’ gun laws, including the ban on assault weapons, and the administration generally does not comment on pending lawsuits.”
Does that make it clear to anyone still carrying Charlie's water?
He needs to be crushed in an epic manner in 2018.
And the Republicans need to know who and why.
NO MORE RINOS
Update on our federal civil rights lawsuit against AG Healey. We had a scheduling hearing yesterday, trial date is May 2018, with Judge William Young.
Thoughts on Young? Appointed by Reagan.
Thoughts on Young? Appointed by Reagan.
I sat on a jury for a case where he presided. Very very sharp mind. Don't know much about his politics.
Conservative judges are less likely to rule against us on the "because its guns" doctrine, but often rule against us on a "because the government has the power" doctrine. So, we can get screwed either way.HIS political views SHOULD have nothing to do with his ruling on facts of the case.
Ya, I know......
******2018....damn
Conservative judges are less likely to rule against us on the "because its guns" doctrine, but often rule against us on a "because the government has the power" doctrine. So, we can get screwed either way.
...so basically it's a coin toss.
It's a challenge to the assault weapons ban, magazine capacity restrictions, and the July 20th enforcement notice
Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk
Update from GOAL on the lawsuit