1. If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership  The benefits pay for the membership many times over.

  2. Dismiss Notice

Why does the IRS need Guns, WSJ

Discussion in 'General Discussion' started by ica5726, Jun 18, 2016.

  1. ica5726

    ica5726 NES Member

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2014
    Messages:
    41
    Likes Received:
    3
    Location:
    Southcoast MA
    I don't buy into a lot of consipracy theory but.... Pay your taxes-an AR15 pointed at you. Mandatory Plant/Animal inspection- M1 armed with nightvision. I'm curious what the Education Department people are packing...

    http://www.wsj.com/articles/end-the-100-bill-uncle-sam-says-no-1466155982

    "The number of non-Defense Department federal officers authorized to make arrests and carry firearms (200,000) now exceeds the number of U.S. Marines (182,000). In its escalating arms and ammo stockpiling, this federal arms race is unlike anything in history. Over the last 20 years, the number of these federal officers with arrest-and-firearm authority has nearly tripled to over 200,000 today, from 74,500 in 1996."

    "OpenTheBooks.com oversight
    report on the militarization of America. The report catalogs federal purchases of guns, ammunition and military-style equipment by seemingly bureaucratic federal agencies. During a nine-year period through 2014, we found, 67 agencies unaffiliated with the Department of Defense spent $1.48 billion on guns and ammo. Of that total, $335.1 million was spent by agencies traditionally viewed as regulatory or administrative, such as the Smithsonian Institution and the U.S. Mint."

    "• The Internal Revenue Service, which has 2,316 special agents, spent nearly $11 million on guns, ammunition and military-style equipment. That’s nearly $5,000 in gear for each agent.
    • The Department of Veterans Affairs, which has 3,700 law-enforcement officers guarding and securing VA medical centers, spent $11.66 million. It spent more than $200,000 on night-vision equipment, $2.3 million for body armor, more than $2 million on guns, and $3.6 million for ammunition. The VA employed no officers with firearm authorization as recently as 1995.
    • The Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service spent $4.77 million purchasing shotguns, .308 caliber rifles, night-vision goggles, propane cannons, liquid explosives, pyro supplies, buckshot, LP gas cannons, drones, remote-control helicopters, thermal cameras, military waterproof thermal infrared scopes and more.
    • The Environmental Protection Agency spent $3.1 million on guns, ammunition and military-style equipment. The EPA has put nearly $800 million since 2005 into its “Criminal Enforcement Division.”
    • The Food and Drug Administration employs 183 heavily armed “special agents.”
    • The University of California, Berkeley acquired 14 5.56mm assault rifles and Yale University police accepted 20 5.56mm assault rifles from the Defense Department. Texas Southern University and Saddleback College police even acquired Mine Resistant Vehicles (MRVs).
    Other paper-pushing federal agencies with firearm-and-arrest authority that have expanded their arsenals since 2006 include the Small Business Administration, Social Security Administration, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Education Department, Energy Department, Bureau of Engraving and Printing, National Institute of Standards and Technology and many others."


     
  2. mac1911

    mac1911 NES Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2008
    Messages:
    26,385
    Likes Received:
    3,872
    Well the GOV is not supposed to use OUR military against US so the created Homeland security . Would not surprise me one bit if IRS and Education department are under that umbrella to some point.
    I'm curious to see how many non citizens work for any of these departments...
    The problem now is how many of these people will follow orders that violate our constitution even more than they already do. Soon enough our local LEO will all be under 100% Federal thumb the .gov army gets even bigger.
    Ohh the joy.

    You also have to remember when .gov gives you money to spend on xyz well those groups needed it or not will spend that money on xyz.

    My dad was a state worker he had a letter once from his department head to stop writing invoices for individual parts and charge for a case. He would show it to people who wondered why the state needs so much money.

    My great uncle always said if the GOV ran as a business it would have gone out of business before they could unlock the doors.

    Also it's the groups or departments we know,nothing about that are a larger concern.
     
    Last edited: Jun 18, 2016
  3. JJ4

    JJ4 NES Member

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2013
    Messages:
    2,764
    Likes Received:
    1,150
    Location:
    South Central MA
    I read this yesterday. Good article. The whole government is becoming the domestic "standing army" that we were warned about.
     
  4. mac1911

    mac1911 NES Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2008
    Messages:
    26,385
    Likes Received:
    3,872
    My great uncle was warning me of things to come many years ago. Starting with the UN and the Muslims. Although he did mention the Muslims and many others that where colonized by the French and English and disrupted countries after WWII really missed them off. Later he would mention our lack of "going to war" vs "military support " or "police actions"
    My great uncle said WAR is the defending of your life and property against those who want to take it. Or if your trying to take it....anything else is a act of being mercenaries for the highest bidder.
     
  5. Asaltweapon

    Asaltweapon NES Member

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2008
    Messages:
    11,778
    Likes Received:
    4,578
    Location:
    Northern Mass
    I think they are scared of Americans.
     
  6. ivarr

    ivarr

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2009
    Messages:
    3,746
    Likes Received:
    681
    Location:
    Great Barrington, Massachusetts
    because you are a " domestic terrorist ".

    all hands on deck...
     
  7. GM-GUY

    GM-GUY NES Member

    Joined:
    May 27, 2008
    Messages:
    8,935
    Likes Received:
    3,937
    Location:
    North Central Mass
  8. new guy

    new guy NES Member

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2009
    Messages:
    20,689
    Likes Received:
    13,948
    The .gov clearly sees the citizenry as its enemy. That we tolerate them assuming any sort of widespread aggressive/offensive posture toward us is both disgusting and depressing.
     
    Last edited: Jun 18, 2016
  9. ivarr

    ivarr

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2009
    Messages:
    3,746
    Likes Received:
    681
    Location:
    Great Barrington, Massachusetts
    department of energy, ( protecting the nuke power plants ), they have the REALLY fun shit.

    LMT
    LWRC
    Brugger & Thormet
     
  10. Horrible

    Horrible NES Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2009
    Messages:
    11,475
    Likes Received:
    3,181
    Location:
    Central MA
    Makes sense why they would be. The role of govt is to protect the rights of its citizens and at every single turn the Federal govt has been the one violating its citizens rights using the money taken from its citizenry by force!
     
  11. new guy

    new guy NES Member

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2009
    Messages:
    20,689
    Likes Received:
    13,948
    They view themselves as our masters.
     
  12. beaker

    beaker NES Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2009
    Messages:
    8,838
    Likes Received:
    2,465
    Location:
    LV-426
    the IRS and FDA have sworn agents and they do criminal investigations and make arrests, so I actually get that, but only by a little bit. I have absolutely no idea why the Department of Education has any armed agents.

    Here is why, Department of Education protecting and serving...
    https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/blogpost/post/education-department-swat-team-raids-california-home/2011/06/08/AGUxlKMH_blog.html


    I am sure the Muslim Brotherhood political officers in these government agencies will make sure all this firepower will only be used for good.
     
  13. dans

    dans NES Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2010
    Messages:
    1,874
    Likes Received:
    457
    Same issue had a story about the dangerous proliferation of body armor.
     
  14. Sparky123

    Sparky123 NES Member

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2014
    Messages:
    1,227
    Likes Received:
    637
    Location:
    Not from around here.
    Those conspiracy theories, you know the ones that made us laugh just a few years ago. Well, today there not as funny or a far fetched as they sounded then.
     
  15. slipknot

    slipknot NES Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2016
    Messages:
    488
    Likes Received:
    174
    Location:
    Middleboro, Taxachusetts
    They should use some of those arms to post armed guards at several key locations around gun free zones to protect the unarmed people from radical Islam terrorists
     
  16. Peicemaker

    Peicemaker

    Joined:
    May 14, 2009
    Messages:
    1,444
    Likes Received:
    516
    Location:
    Cape Cod, DPRM
    I'm surprised they haven't armed themselves sooner. A band of thieves is seldom unarmed.
     
  17. Rob Boudrie

    Rob Boudrie NES Member

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2005
    Messages:
    33,748
    Likes Received:
    10,103
    The federal officer's gun, and the power to carry it, is in many cases (poultry cops, IRS, etc.) a symbolic emblem of power, even more than the badge or agency ID (which really serves to document their power, not as the source of their power). Take away the gun and they are no longer "above" the serfs who must often be unarmed in their presence.

    It can also be a union thing. Get gun authority, you are now a "federal officer" rather than "federal employee", and can demand all LE pay, perks and benefits.
     
    Last edited: Jun 18, 2016
  18. weekendracer

    weekendracer

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2009
    Messages:
    3,396
    Likes Received:
    1,109
    Location:
    Louisiana
    Department of Education has 1811's same as FBI/ATF/SS/name the agency. They go and arrest people too for fraud when it comes to school procurement scams and the such.

    Why? Because the FBI is picky about what they will investigate. Agencies got tired of being turned down when they asked for the FBI to go arrest someone.

    - - - Updated - - -

    Probably some truth to some of this, but the LEO pay scale joins the regular GS scale after GS10, so it's not really a LEO vs. Non-LEO argument pay wise.
     
  19. ochmude

    ochmude Marine Veteran

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2007
    Messages:
    6,315
    Likes Received:
    1,784
    Location:
    Yuma, AZ
    I don't think it's so much a union thing as it is whether or not any particular employee falls under 5 USC 8412(d).
     
  20. Obie1

    Obie1 NES Member

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2012
    Messages:
    7,289
    Likes Received:
    5,345
    Location:
    WMass
  21. Spanz

    Spanz NES Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2009
    Messages:
    28,569
    Likes Received:
    13,412
    I have no idea WHY they would need guns at the IRS, but expect a full tax audit coming your way for posting the question!
     
  22. Spanz

    Spanz NES Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2009
    Messages:
    28,569
    Likes Received:
    13,412
    Actually I was at the hover dam recently, and it IS a potential terrorist attack site. If you took out that dam, a couple of states would be out of electricity for years. During WWII, they actually stationed full time snipers up in the hills to kill any Nazis trying to breach the dam.
     
  23. ochmude

    ochmude Marine Veteran

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2007
    Messages:
    6,315
    Likes Received:
    1,784
    Location:
    Yuma, AZ
  24. Rob Boudrie

    Rob Boudrie NES Member

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2005
    Messages:
    33,748
    Likes Received:
    10,103
    You can see the bunker on the hill from the top of the dam.
    The term "police" is generally used to refer to organizations/people that have special government granted powers - arrest; ability to file charges like assaulting a police officer; ability to carry on the badge and in places where even licensed civilians(*) cannot and, in the case of federal officers, carry on commercial airlines.

    As far as I know, the feds do not use the term "police" to refer to the low level security types they hire, but do not give any traditional "police powers" to.

    Usually, this means govt employees, however, there are private police forces given full police powers by the state (College police; RR police)


    * - I am using Webster's definition of civilian; not the "all non-military" definition some on NES feels overrides the dictionary definition.
     
    Last edited: Jun 19, 2016
  25. ochmude

    ochmude Marine Veteran

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2007
    Messages:
    6,315
    Likes Received:
    1,784
    Location:
    Yuma, AZ
    True, federal police agencies do have powers of arrest and so forth. I guess what I mean is that many federal agencies which are named Something Police, such as the ones Obie1 mentioned (Mint Police, Smithsonian Police, Hoover Dam Police), are primarily focused on fixed-site security much like a private/commercial security guard or military sentry. They walk perimeters, monitor cameras and alarms, control access to secure areas, man booths at parking lots, and other such duties that one typically thinks of as being "security" duties rather than "police" duties. If you compared the daily activities of a U.S. Mint Police officer with a Smith & Wesson security guard, I'm sure you'd find them to be extremely similar.

    This is not to say that all federal police agencies are like that. BIA Police are very much akin to a county sheriff's office (not including New England), and U.S. Park Police have various duties which often are identical to a municipal department or highway patrol.
     
  26. Rob Boudrie

    Rob Boudrie NES Member

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2005
    Messages:
    33,748
    Likes Received:
    10,103
    True, but the S&W Security guard cannot flash his credential to carry through the metal detector in a federal building, or carry with impunity in NYC and NJ, nor will the S&W security guard be treated as a "LE professional" and assumed to be in the right if (s)he pops a cap in someone when off duty.

    I was referring to the status afforded their position; not their day to day duties.
     

Share This Page