Might you be suggesting that that's all of them!Dont worry. Only the police with pensions will enforce tyranny.
If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Be sure to enter the NES/MFS May Giveaway ***Canik METE SFX***
Might you be suggesting that that's all of them!Dont worry. Only the police with pensions will enforce tyranny.
She spent the entire time with the gun pointed at the people with her finger on the trigger. She deserves to lose her guns. They did not represent anywhere near the threat that justifies that.
The gun shouldn't be pointing at someone with your finger on the trigger unless you have decided to fire.
Really?THE FRONT GATES WERE TORN DOWN.
It was clear to me who our side is when i wrote that but after reading that quote maybe not so much.I'm getting confused. When you say "our side", whom do you mean?
Really!Really?
Q1: Precisely what do the gates control access to?
Q2: Precisely what makes them "front" gates?
Don't mind me. I'm just old and confused (and confusing who posted what).It was clear to me who our side is when i wrote that but after reading that quote maybe not so much.
I'd wager that since they are white upper class they got a doorbell ring with "Sir, we have a warrant. You need to let us in and show us where your AR15 is", whereas a lower class black family having a black rifle confiscated for evidence would get the swat treatment.
She spent the entire time with the gun pointed at the people with her finger on the trigger. She deserves to lose her guns. They did not represent anywhere near the threat that justifies that.
The gun shouldn't be pointing at someone with your finger on the trigger unless you have decided to fire.
I'm not sure why it matters, but this is the gate they broke down.View attachment 372105View attachment 372105
It quite literally does not matter. That whole area is private property. The road is not a public road. At the very least every single "protester" was trespassing.
Really!
A1. Precisely the property of the McCloskys
A2. Precisely the fact that the gates lead to the front driveway, therefore, precisely making them “front” gates.
I'm not sure why it matters, but this is the gate they broke down.View attachment 372105View attachment 372105
It matters because it's trivial to argue that that gate is not the front gate to their personal private house. (even if the road is private) It's the gate to a private road that leads to many, many houses.
What makes that gate special to #1 Portland Place, and not special to any other (completely unaffected) house on Portland Place.
I dont think it is, its something else.I only hope this is sarcasm.
Does not matter. Destruction of private property, threatened by an angry mob, we will kill your dog and burn your house down. Need we even debate this?I'm not sure why it matters, but this is the gate they broke down.View attachment 372105View attachment 372105
This seems to be a pretty good indicator of how such situations will go down in liberal shit-hole cities, even in a 2A strong state. Lefties will even eat their own to fulfill the agenda. Guns = bad, more wealth than you 'need' = bad. Combine the two and you are ripe to become an example.
By watering the tree.Honestly I don't see how our side wins this.
I wouldn't have bothered with the AR. Use two inexpensive pump shotguns loaded with OO buck and 1oz. slugs, held at the "Rhodesian Ready" position and fingers off triggers. Ching sling would be a good addition. A 10/22 would be good as well. IDF forces shoot Palestinian protesters in the legs with them. Why subject an expensive gun like an AR to confiscation when cheap ones will more than do the job?
A 10/22 would be good as well. IDF forces shoot Palestinian protesters in the THIRD legs / NADS with them.