Not right now. She is a snake in the grass 100%Maybe so.
That said she isn't running for or in office.
If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Not right now. She is a snake in the grass 100%Maybe so.
That said she isn't running for or in office.
And u believe her?Yup. She was 100% for all of the above. That tweet was from 5 years ago.
Then COVID happened and according to her she had an epiphany as to why the founders included the 2A.
Ohh I don’t trust her.Not right now. She is a snake in the grass 100%
NoIf politicians lie, and she was anti-2A while a politician, doesn’t that mean she’s telling the truth now.
Maybe. But she’s been consistent on foreign intervention, media propaganda, and the deep state.Not right now. She is a snake in the grass 100%
Exactly two of us watched the video, dude. I’m cautiously optimistic that she’s changed. I know I did.Ohh I don’t trust her.
I just thought the points she raised (whether she believes them or not) were interesting. I know I’ve encountered a lot of people that woke up to the BS during/after COVID.
If politicians lie, and she was anti-2A while a politician, doesn’t that mean she’s telling the truth now.
Propaganda and deep state you say?….Maybe. But she’s been consistent on foreign intervention, media propaganda, and the deep state.
I don’t expect the single-issue voters here to be convinced, but it’s curious thst many of them supported Trump, despite his history of being anti-2A.
Funny how she says Covid opened her 2A eyes… I thought it was a stalker…maybe that came out of the other side of her mouthExactly two of us watched the video, dude. I’m cautiously optimistic that she’s changed. I know I did.
Is there nobody else eligible for office?She may be on the level or not.
Only way to find out and elect her and pray like a battered wife you made the right choice and don't get beaten again.
All we have to go on is past performance , which sucked.
The truth is, there has never been a gun law ever passed that will stop criminals, whackos, or terrorists from obtaining or using those guns to kill people. Gun laws have one purpose and one purpose only, to regulate law-abiding citizens. But no matter how much the government regulates law-abiding citizens, acts of gun violence continue to rise. And nothing any democrat or those who agree with their flawed ideology can say or do will change that. In a civilized society, people do not just shoot other people, but we are no longer living in a civilized society, that should be obvious to everyone in this world by now.
Perhaps this will help you understand: Elections don't happen in a vacuum. Many, many people don't vote for the candidate they like, or the candidate who agrees with them. They vote for the candidate they dislike less. I have a great deal of contempt for Trump as a person, and I'm well aware he didn't agree with me on many issues - but what was the alternative? I understand why many people choose third-party candidates as a protest vote, but the sad fact is that in our political system, with two parties that between them command 90+% of the total vote, a vote for a third-party candidate may as well be a vote for the other side.I don’t expect the single-issue voters here to be convinced, but it’s curious thst many of them supported Trump, despite his history of being anti-2A.
Remember when Trump was a democrat?It's amazing how many will hate Tulsi forever, but still trust Trump.
All politicians lie for votes. Believe me, once a gun grabber, always a gun grabber. That goes double for politicians! Trust them at your own peril IMHO!
1) I think he has a better than average chance, unfortunately.
2) Agree
3) She is hot.
I will vote for Trump if there is no other choice You are in FL, you gotta vote, at least your vote makes a difference unlike here in MA.
“I generally oppose gun control, but I support the ban on assault weapons and I support a slightly longer waiting period to purchase a gun. With today’s internet technology we should be able to tell within 72 hours if a potential gun owner has a record.” - Trump 2000 book “The America We Deserve”.Remember when Trump was a democrat?
Yes, I love being called a RINO by Trump cultists. He's anti-gun, pro-abortion, a swamp creature from his earliest days, and literally a Republican of convenience.Remember when Trump was a democrat?
To be clear, I support Trump, I’m just not a boot-licker and think if we’re going to excuse his past transgressions Tulsi deserves that same courtesy. And she’s significantly better than Trump in virtually every other way.Yes, I love being called a RINO by Trump cultists. He's anti-gun, pro-abortion, a swamp creature from his earliest days, and literally a Republican of convenience.
All true. But it's also true that he appointed three pro-2A Supreme Court justices, without whom the Bruen case wouldn't even have been heard, let alone decided the way it was. And he did something that no other Republican candidate for president had done since Ronald Reagan: he took the fight to the Democrats. He made conservatives believe they could win - not just win a battle here and there, but win the war.Yes, I love being called a RINO by Trump cultists. He's anti-gun, pro-abortion, a swamp creature from his earliest days, and literally a Republican of convenience.
So basically, a Democrat with a history of anti-2A stances had a change of heart, left the Democratic Party, and ended up having a positive impact on gun rights?All true. But it's also true that he appointed three pro-2A Supreme Court justices, without whom the Bruen case wouldn't even have been heard, let alone decided the way it was. And he did something that no other Republican candidate for president had done since Ronald Reagan: he took the fight to the Democrats. He made conservatives believe they could win - not just win a battle here and there, but win the war.
I don't know.....if asked, I'd be happy to work under her!I question the judgement of anyone that considers tulsi ‘hot.’
I always give credit where it's due.All true. But it's also true that he appointed three pro-2A Supreme Court justices, without whom the Bruen case wouldn't even have been heard, let alone decided the way it was. And he did something that no other Republican candidate for president had done since Ronald Reagan: he took the fight to the Democrats. He made conservatives believe they could win - not just win a battle here and there, but win the war.
Bump stock ban and take the guns first is positive?So basically, a Democrat with a history of anti-2A stances had a change of heart, left the Democratic Party, and ended up having a positive impact on gun rights?
That's certainly one way to look at it.So basically, a Democrat with a history of anti-2A stances had a change of heart, left the Democratic Party, and ended up having a positive impact on gun rights?
The Trumpists will tell you that it was all 6D chess: he imposed executive rules knowing that the judges he appointed would overturn them.Bump stock ban and take the guns first is positive?