Yesterday I had first jam with Smith Wesson 438 revolver, using Tula .38 steel case ammo.
I had used Remington .38 brass-cased ammo without jamming problem. The price is about 28 cents per round. At that time, I was enthusiastic about becoming a sub-MOA sharp-shooter with a J-frame revolver, I felt the need for thousands round of .38 ammo. Thus I bought some Tula .38 steel case ammo at 20 cents per round.
I had shot a couple hundreds of Tula steel case ammo through my 438, without any jamming problem. The steel case tends to stick in the cylinder. I could not use my hand to push the ejection rod. It would not budge. I need to rest the ejection rod on the table, and push the revolver forward. The bigger force will push the spent steel case out of cylinder.
Yesterday I shot more than 20 rounds. Then I loaded 5 rounds. After the 3rd round was fired, the cylinder is jammed tight in the revolver. I can push the ejection button forward, but the cylinder cannot swing left. The trigger cannot move, and hammer cannot move.
A staff in the range came to my rescue. He swung the cylinder out of way, and ejected 2 un-fired rounds. Then he brought a hammer and a punch, and punched out the 3 spent steel cases.
After I came home, I did dry fire on 438. Everything seems fine.
For some reason, I was not at the scene when the staff swing out the cylinder. I can only guess that he used a rubber mallet to knock the cylinder out.
Now I am more realistic about the accuracy potential of small revolvers. I will not need to buy thousands rounds of .38 ammo. I will stick with brass-case ammo from now on.
For Tula steel case .38 ammo, I guess that the dimension variance is a little too large. Some rounds end up jamming cylinder tight. If that happens again, should I push forward the ejection button, and knock on the cylinder with a rubber mallet?
I had used Remington .38 brass-cased ammo without jamming problem. The price is about 28 cents per round. At that time, I was enthusiastic about becoming a sub-MOA sharp-shooter with a J-frame revolver, I felt the need for thousands round of .38 ammo. Thus I bought some Tula .38 steel case ammo at 20 cents per round.
I had shot a couple hundreds of Tula steel case ammo through my 438, without any jamming problem. The steel case tends to stick in the cylinder. I could not use my hand to push the ejection rod. It would not budge. I need to rest the ejection rod on the table, and push the revolver forward. The bigger force will push the spent steel case out of cylinder.
Yesterday I shot more than 20 rounds. Then I loaded 5 rounds. After the 3rd round was fired, the cylinder is jammed tight in the revolver. I can push the ejection button forward, but the cylinder cannot swing left. The trigger cannot move, and hammer cannot move.
A staff in the range came to my rescue. He swung the cylinder out of way, and ejected 2 un-fired rounds. Then he brought a hammer and a punch, and punched out the 3 spent steel cases.
After I came home, I did dry fire on 438. Everything seems fine.
For some reason, I was not at the scene when the staff swing out the cylinder. I can only guess that he used a rubber mallet to knock the cylinder out.
Now I am more realistic about the accuracy potential of small revolvers. I will not need to buy thousands rounds of .38 ammo. I will stick with brass-case ammo from now on.
For Tula steel case .38 ammo, I guess that the dimension variance is a little too large. Some rounds end up jamming cylinder tight. If that happens again, should I push forward the ejection button, and knock on the cylinder with a rubber mallet?