Stun Gun Challenge (Martel v. Healey)

[amm5061]

Oh no, not "unsafe" - "deceptive" or "misleading" and those are supposed to be in keeping with standards set by federal agencies, who say that they are NOT in keeping with their standards. That statute is designed to crack down on used car dealers lying to people; there's nothing deceptive about telling someone a gun has a 3lb trigger or a pot metal frame when you sell it to them.

Goddamn right! Her bullshit is not consumer protection, it's an anti-gun assault on civil rights.

 

[CrackPot]

Goddamn right! Her bullshit is not consumer protection, it's an anti-gun assault on civil rights.

It's not "her". This goes back to 1998 when Scott Harshbarger was the AG. He is the source of the AG using consumer laws to push an anti-gun agenda. Thomas Reilly was the one who decided the Glock LCI was inadequate to meet the CMR written during Harshbarger. A long line of Democrap AGs with Healey just the most recent finding a way to leave a legacy...

 

[amm5061]

It's not "her". This goes back to 1998 when Scott Harshbarger was the AG. He is the source of the AG using consumer laws to push an anti-gun agenda. Thomas Reilly was the one who decided the Glock LCI was inadequate to meet the CMR written during Harshbarger. A long line of Democrap AGs with Healey just the most recent finding a way to leave a legacy...

I am aware of the history. Simply because she didn't start the bullshit does not excuse her from continuing the bullshit.

 

[Chevy 2 65]

I am aware of the history. Simply because she didn't start the bullshit does not excuse her from continuing the bullshit.

She should have cleaned up all the BS...but