• If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership  The benefits pay for the membership many times over.

Socialist Rifle Association

I thought we were accepting of all peoples who like guns. Are maybe just those who share our opinions? Hypocrites some of us are.

These socialist people do sound like whackos though. But we should accept them and invite some to a range. Don't we always say to bring a non-believer to a range?

Oh, I forgot. Double standard.
any help pushing for less gun control is a good thing I suppose. If their dollars ultimately help fund court challenges then fine....

but I ain't going shooting with commies. Our 'alliance' end where their dollars overlap with our GOAL and NRA dollars.
 
It really should come as no surprise that socialists support private gun ownership PRIOR to taking power. They need them to overthrow the capitalists, However, AFTER they gain power, it's a completely different story. Of course their argument is with the utopia they're going to create, no one will need to privately own firearms, or anything else for that matter.
 
I thought we were accepting of all peoples who like guns. Are maybe just those who share our opinions? Hypocrites some of us are.

These socialist people do sound like whackos though. But we should accept them and invite some to a range. Don't we always say to bring a non-believer to a range?

Oh, I forgot. Double standard.

Found one.
 
I thought we were accepting of all peoples who like guns. Are maybe just those who share our opinions? Hypocrites some of us are.

These socialist people do sound like whackos though. But we should accept them and invite some to a range. Don't we always say to bring a non-believer to a range?

Oh, I forgot. Double standard.
Big difference between anti-gun and anti-american. If their members are there because they don't feel that they would be accepted at other clubs because of there race, religion or sexual preference then thats too bad and I would certainly entertain taking someone to the range if thats the case. If they're trying to organize antifa training sessions like some of the comments I've seen then I'm allset and call it double standard if you want but I draw the line with communists and people who want to harm regular Americans who love this country and the principals it was founded upon.
 
It really should come as no surprise that socialists support private gun ownership PRIOR to taking power. They need them to overthrow the capitalists, However, AFTER they gain power, it's a completely different story. Of course their argument is with the utopia they're going to create, no one will need to privately own firearms, or anything else for that matter.

Socialists never support private gun ownership, not before, not after, these kiddos don't know how to socialism and probably think themselves salt-of-the-earth proletariat instead of filthy bourgeois that they are.

I would totally join these a**h***s if not for capitalist dues, may be I play Karl Marx and ask wife for money. Otherwise a whole lot of things they push are not only good, but irritate conservacucks:

1. Homos with rifles! f*** yeah, don't we all dream of drilling the third hole?
2. Guns to poor and brown people ... f*** yeah!
3. Unrestricted MGs ... f*** yeah!
 
Big difference between anti-gun and anti-american. If their members are there because they don't feel that they would be accepted at other clubs because of there race, religion or sexual preference then thats too bad and I would certainly entertain taking someone to the range if thats the case. If they're trying to organize antifa training sessions like some of the comments I've seen then I'm allset and call it double standard if you want but I draw the line with communists and people who want to harm regular Americans who love this country and the principals it was founded upon.

It's easier to reject these faggots, many of them can still be molded into red blooded Americans. We just need to add National to their Socialism [rofl]The harder path is to used them, as Kano said "yield in order to win" We want liberty and guns and the stalwarts of capitalism like Faceplant and Google, f*** those a**h***s. I will not come to their aid.

Elites created this soy army, it's only right that soy army destroys the elite. I challenge antifags to go after real usurpers of power in this state.
 
It's easier to reject these faggots, many of them can still be molded into red blooded Americans. We just need to add National to their Socialism [rofl]The harder path is to used them, as Kano said "yield in order to win" We want liberty and guns and the stalwarts of capitalism like Faceplant and Google, f*** those a**h***s. I will not come to their aid.

Elites created this soy army, it's only right that soy army destroys the elite. I challenge antifags to go after real usurpers of power in this state.

The problem is that they've been brainwashed to believe orange man bad, and that everyone who doesn't agree with them is a racist redneck who drives around stomping gays in their spare time. If they can be re-directed great, but something tells me their only targets will ever be conservatives. They're defective, or at minimum too stupid or idealistic to acknowledge any sort of reality. They want The State to come to the rescue of trannies everywhere, and to provide everyone with everything they might ever "need." They don't give half a shit about gun rights or anything else that's relevant self-determination-wise.

But hey, we all like guns so we're all on the same team, right free? We're all hypocrites for not supporting these c***s who would march each and every one of us here on NES off to the gulag at the first opportunity.
 
I suppose none of you lived in a socialist country... This is how they win. They're already organized, rioting and attacking the people, the police, and businesses. Once they get guns, it's October Revolution all over! Ask ANYONE from St. Petersburg, Russia if their roots in the city go beyond 1917. You won't find any! Why? Because Socialists armed themselves and massacred the entire city population for being "bourgeoisie"!
 
Honestly I don’t even give a shit if your a gun owner or not anymore. I really don’t, I’m past this fake gun owner 2A Brotherhood, it’s bullshit. I will take a non Gun guy who supports the good in this country over a Socialist AR owner. I’ve met a ton of shitbags who own guns and they can go F’K themselves along with the Biden Supporters here.
 
Lol. Where they gonna source their ammo...? They're in the same boat we all are... [rofl2]

They are sitting at home on their computers banging F5 on the TSUSA website, just like here.
I thought we were accepting of all peoples who like guns. Are maybe just those who share our opinions? Hypocrites some of us are.

These socialist people do sound like whackos though. But we should accept them and invite some to a range. Don't we always say to bring a non-believer to a range?

Oh, I forgot. Double standard.

Ya, the infamous "Brought Liberals to the range" congratulate me on my virtue signaling !

Never understood that logic..

" Hey I got it, I'll take my enemy to the range, show them how to shoot, obtain a license to get a gun, help them obtain said gun and ammo!!!!!!"

Then II'll start a virtue signaling thread on NES and get likes from all the other Liberals.

The strangest thing is people give these people "likes" as if they are liking the fact that somebody is training the enemy and bragging about it here.

Congratulations guys, you armed people who are voting for someone that wants to take away your right to self defense.
 
Well, I guess this settles it. If the Socialist Rifle Association has the Right to exist... So does the NRA.
 
Everyone join, then take over and go in a new direction [devil]
I was gonna post this link,
but the nonsense about this being a regional resource
owned by a national organization scotched the idea.
Still...
44gyb9.jpg


For the life of me, I can't find the full clip, just the intro.
SNL jealously guards their multimedia.
Not saying they have that particular piece online,
but if so, you're most likely to find it on the SNL site's video server.
 
Ah, yeah...ok.

"This range and property will be owned collectively by the constituent chapters.
Depending on where we decide to purchase the land, we will be looking into a way
to transfer legal ownership of the land back to the appropriate indigenous group.
We will not purchase any land without first consulting these groups to ensure we do
not perpetuate any forms of colonialism."
Sounds silly , how do tou prove who was there first?
 
Back
Top Bottom