If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Be sure to enter the NES/MFS May Giveaway ***Canik METE SFX***
Just curious to see what the responses would be - who has experience handling both guns? How do they compare and which did you prefer?
First - two different trigger systems....well really three...
The P320 is a striker fired so its a fairly light trigger with a short length of travel. Th P30sk can be either DA/SA or LEM (light pull with long travel).
So its a personal preference on trigger type. I'm not a striker fan so I prefer the P30sk in either DA/SA or LEM.
Aloha
^this
these are apples and oranges. both are good but it comes down to what the owner is looking for. anyone who tells you "this one is better" is simply stating their preferences. that being said, the P30 is better
The answer is get both
Well, I have the VP9 which I love. The mag release isn't an issue with me...I think the Sig 320c though has a slimmer grip and weight wise, it's lighter than the HK from what I've read.
I have the HK P2000sk as well as Glocks (26, 19, 17) Massad Ayoob did a great write up on the Sig 320 so that has my attention. I nearly bought the P30sk but just didn't make the leap yet.
All depends on your hand size. I had a P30SK and while the trigger was decent along with the grip, I couldn't get over the fact my pinky would hang over the base of the mag. Could never get a firm grasp while shooting.
Currently have a 320C and so far I love it minus the mag restrictions. All I've done to it is the flat faces Apex trigger along with Dawson's sights. Every time I shoot it she puts a smile on my face.
I have handled the p30sk and my pinky kind of hangs there which I don't like. The p2000sk just fits my hand better and feels great. I think I'm going to get the 320c as I'd like something different...that I can grip more comfortably.
Wouldn,t the 320 SC be more comparable to the p30sk than the 320 C?