Ok, not all at once, but we have to think long term on this one...
Assume that one already has a 92FS and eventually will own a Sig 226, M&P?? and 1911.
So, arguments of "you need a .45 or you pee sitting down" need not apply. It's on the list, I'll get there eventually and it will be a 1911. Not a Glock, M&P or Sig in .45...
The question is what combination of caliber for the 226 and M&P?
9mm for the 226 has the benefit of hi-cap pre-ban mags which are out of the question with the M&P. I value the ability to carry lots of rounds very highly, particularly with a 9mm so I can answer that "you need a .45 or you pee sitting down issue" with "that's ok, I can fire 15+1 hollow point rounds from a sitting position just fine thanks".
As I understand it, .40 rules out pre-ban mags on the 226...
But hey, maybe I'll escape from MA eventually?
Anyway... So, see the poll, which combination of M&P and Sig would you do if you did both?
Assume that one already has a 92FS and eventually will own a Sig 226, M&P?? and 1911.
So, arguments of "you need a .45 or you pee sitting down" need not apply. It's on the list, I'll get there eventually and it will be a 1911. Not a Glock, M&P or Sig in .45...
The question is what combination of caliber for the 226 and M&P?
9mm for the 226 has the benefit of hi-cap pre-ban mags which are out of the question with the M&P. I value the ability to carry lots of rounds very highly, particularly with a 9mm so I can answer that "you need a .45 or you pee sitting down issue" with "that's ok, I can fire 15+1 hollow point rounds from a sitting position just fine thanks".
As I understand it, .40 rules out pre-ban mags on the 226...
But hey, maybe I'll escape from MA eventually?
Anyway... So, see the poll, which combination of M&P and Sig would you do if you did both?