ochmude
Marine Veteran
Even TX law which is one of the more sane approaches on the topic limits deadly force to night time and the replaceability of the item. So is your question; Should there be NO LIMITS on the use of force or should there be NO OPTION WHATSOEVER? ie; a very black and white approach at the extremes. Or is your question; should there be some reasonable barriers to the use of deadly force (ie; gunning down the dandelion picking 4 yro) or a blanket prohibition like we have here in MA?
Black and white. From reading everyone's responses, it seems like many of those that are voting "no" to the original question are doing so because there isn't a "yes, but only in certain circumstances" option. I just wanted to try and see who really thinks it should never be an option, as is the case in MA.