They should sue Honda motors too. The car he drove to the scene played a bigger part than the rifle they found in the trunk.
This.
If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
They should sue Honda motors too. The car he drove to the scene played a bigger part than the rifle they found in the trunk.
The complaint was filed by the following plaintiffs:
- Donna L. Soto, administratrix of the estate Of Victoria L. Soto
- Ian And Nicole Hockley, co-administrators of the estate of Dylan C. Hockley
- William D. Sherlach, executor at bridgeport of the estate of Mary Joy Sherlach. He also was part of the complaint individually
- Leonard Pozner, administrator of the estate of Noah S. Pozner
- Gilles J. Rousseau, administrator of the estate of Lauren G. Rousseau
- David C. Wheeler, administrator of the estate of Benjamin A. Wheeler
- Neil Heslin And Scarlett Lewis, co-administrators of the estate of Jesse Mccord Lewis
- Mark And Jacqueline Barden, co-administrators of the estate of Daniel G. Barden
- Mary D'avino, administratrix of the estate of Rachel M. D'avino
- Natalie Hammond
Read more: http://www.wfsb.com/story/27629236/...inst-gunmaker-distributor-store#ixzz3LzN1JApg
Bill Sherlach, whose wife was a school psychologist killed in the shooting said in a statement that gun industry should be held accountable.
“In business, measuring risk prior to producing, marketing and selling a product or service is standard procedure. For far too long the gun industry has been given legislative safe harbor from this standard business practice," Sherlach said. "These companies assume no responsibility for marketing and selling a product to the general population who are not trained to use it nor even understand the power of it. I believe in the Second Amendment, but I also believe that the gun industry should be brought to bear the same business risk that every other business assumes when it comes to producing, marketing and selling a product.”
Wouldn't the dead Perp and the Mother who owned the weapon that wasn't secured be the only responsible parties here
They will only do that if the case is not dismissed. And it should be since there is a law on the books stating as much. "Should" being the operative word.
I think the MFG could get the case against them dismissed because there is a law that protects them from such lawsuits, but I don't think that law protects distributors and dealers.
I believe they mentioned the now out of business dealer as part of the suit as well. They will go after anyone who had anything to do with Lanza. Next they will be suing Honda for supplying the vehicle that drove him to the school...
The LONE killer and responsible party is dead. The only other person slightly responsible is his dead mother who should have known her son was a nut job.
This is about $$$ and publicity to jump start some agenda campaign.
Wouldn't the dead Perp and the Mother who owned the weapon that wasn't secured be the only responsible parties here
The LONE killer and responsible party is dead. The only other person slightly responsible is his dead mother who should have known her son was a nut job.
This is about $$$ and publicity to jump start some agenda campaign.
I can't wait to read the response, particularly when the defendant(s) correct lines 1-13.
Which I wonder, since the official report hasn't been released yet, will this compel it since the suit claim of firearm used in the attack?
From the complaint, it looks like they used Wikipedia as a source.
If the parents were looking for justice, then yes that would be the case. Instead, they're just looking to dance on their children's graves and seek a quick payday. You can call me callous if you want to, but with what they're doing here, maliciously going after innocent people, I don't see their motives being any better than what Lanza's were on that Friday morning two years ago. Their actions certainly aren't as extreme, but their motivation is exactly what his was...to harm innocent people to make up for their own issues. No parent should have to bury their child, but projecting that grief as malice toward innocent people is absurd.
Notice that the parents of 11 of the children, and the families of the six faculty killed in the attack aren't named on the lawsuit. I'm just guessing, but I'd bet that the reason they aren't involved in the lawsuit isn't because no one told them about it. I'd be willing to bet that they were pressured to join it as well, but didn't want to cheapen the memory of their loved one by attacking another innocent person.
To be fair, from everything I've read, even the psychologists who had evaluated Lanza prior to the attack stated that he had no inclination to violence and no signs of psychosis or sociopathic behavior that would have led him to commit such an atrocity. Either the professionals that evaluated him really dropped the ball, or there was something that caused him to change after the evaluations.
Wow, paragraphs 1-49 contain so many falsehoods and complete fairy tales that I do not really know how I would respond. 49 is just a contrivance of thin air and a liberal wet dream. I would love to see citations for these assertions.
I believe they mentioned the now out of business dealer as part of the suit as well. They will go after anyone who had anything to do with Lanza. Next they will be suing Honda for supplying the vehicle that drove him to the school...
The LONE killer and responsible party is dead. The only other person slightly responsible is his dead mother who should have known her son was a nut job.
This is about $$$ and publicity to jump start some agenda campaign.
The end game here is a de facto AWB.
Any monetary judgement in their favor would ensure that manufacturers would have no
choice but to discontinue semi-auto rifle sales, and dealers would have to remove them from their racks.
the most popular patrol rifle round, the 5.56mm NATO (.223 Remington) will penetrate fewer
walls than service pistol rounds or 12 gauge slugs.
The rifle is a superior tool. It allows the officer to either stand off from the threat
or, if the situation requires, advance to the threat with the confidence that the tool in their
hands can deal with almost any perceived threat.
After reading it I think you are correct. I also thought I was at the VPC website for a second.
To be fair, from everything I've read, even the psychologists who had evaluated Lanza prior to the attack stated that he had no inclination to violence and no signs of psychosis or sociopathic behavior that would have led him to commit such an atrocity. Either the professionals that evaluated him really dropped the ball, or there was something that caused him to change after the evaluations.
Or he knew how to work the evaluators and/or the evaluations?
Or he knew how to work the evaluators and/or the evaluations?
I wish I could get my loads to 4000 fps, that would be a flat trajectory out to about 300 yards.Line 59 says the AR-15 muzzle velocity is 4000 feet per second. If I remember right the m-16a2 with a 20" Barrel and green tips is only around 2800, So a 16" barrel should be less. Correct me if I'm wrong.