So, you're all saying my assless chaps are out of the question?
I just threw up in my mouth a little.
If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Be sure to enter the NES/MFS May Giveaway ***Canik METE SFX***
So, you're all saying my assless chaps are out of the question?
So, you're all saying my assless chaps are out of the question?
Well then count me out. I'm not getting in line for whatever they think I should or shouldn't look like. Good luck.
So, you're all saying my assless chaps are out of the question?
More's the pity. But if we give them a way to dismiss us, they will. If you don't fit their narrative, they can't just dismiss us as a bunch of kooks.
And that doesn't mean spit when in the eye of the beholder (read: new england liberals) you look like their stereotype of an ignorant, slack-jawed yokel. You immediately become dismissable and your argument, no matter how eloquent and right, is tossed into the garbage.
Anyone who ditches the professional attire of their culture to try to get the liberal morons not to dismiss them as kooks, are kooks. Anyone who tells me that I cannot dress in professional clothes and wear the hat that I wear to formal occasions can screw because that makes you one of them.
Here is any idea for you: If you want to get them to not "dismiss you" turn your guns in. If you still have a pair of testicles, keep the hat and the guns and be proud of who you are because they have already dismissed you, it's time to dismiss them.
Dude, don't listen to anyone. Dress like you would normally, and don't try and standardize and sterilize yourself and your preferences because it's more palatable to liberals. Your a gun owner! It's not a f-ing fashion statement. Just be there, with your beliefs and your concerns.
I’ve been reading postings on the thread regarding the governor’s desire to increase LTC fees. The talk of a demonstration and the high emotions being expressed triggered thoughts about possible pitfalls if things are not carefully planned. I’m in full support of a demonstration, but this is not a time for a bunch of the guys to just jump into the car, go to Boston, and walk around with signs. There are potential dangers to individual demonstrators and the cause we support.
For those who know your history, stop for a moment and remember the ’68 Democratic convention riot in Chicago. The demonstrators believed in their cause, emotions were high, and everything started very peacefully. A person, or persons, unknown threw something or pushed someone (whatever) and triggered a violent confrontation with the police. Many were hurt and many were arrested. For many of the demonstrators (I wasn’t one of them, I was in the Army, overseas) being arrested was their “badge of courage.” Fast forward to today. If any of our demonstrators are arrested, there is a very real likelihood of permanent loss of LTC.
Anyone see where I’m going yet? The location is Boston. Mayor Menino, with his strong anti-gun agenda and the Boston Police department, are providing “security” for the demonstration. Demonstrators, composed of NES, GOAL, NRA members, and other supporters of the 2nd Amendment, gather at the Boston Commons and State House (after securing the appropriate permits, of course) with signs and begin their march, chanting as they go.
Suddenly, someone in the group of demonstrators (the media, the mayor, and the police will later insist it was one of the demonstrators) throws a rock, brick, (pick an object of your choice) at the police, who respond with “force necessary to quell the uprising.” Like ’68, many will be arrested (disarmed) and charged. The media will portray the assembled protesters as riotous gun nuts who provoked the police. Menino will crow about clearing this “dangerous element” from the streets of Boston. And they will have effectively removed those arrested from the roles of law-abiding citizens who are “allowed” to carry guns (more guns off the streets).
Now, none of us would throw that bottle or brick at the police. We are law-abiding folks. However, it’s not too far fetched to imaging the opponents of the 2nd Amendment attempting to insert some of their own into the crowd of demonstrators. And, if one or several of them begin throwing things to get the ball rolling, well the trigger has been pulled, so to speak, and the chain of events outlined above is put into motion.
Any demonstration being considered is NOT a “just throw the boys (and girls) into the car and go to Boston” affair. The stakes and seriousness are much too high. If this demonstration is to happen, it must be carefully planned with a practiced eye toward the potential tactics of our opposition, and contingency plans to negate or counter them. We need those with a clear head and objective view toward the task at hand. We need those with experience and those with legal expertise to guide the process of organizing.
Anyone who ditches the professional attire of their culture to try to get the liberal morons not to dismiss them as kooks, are kooks. Anyone who tells me that I cannot dress in professional clothes and wear the hat that I wear to formal occasions can screw because that makes you one of them.
Here is any idea for you: If you want to get them to not "dismiss you" turn your guns in. If you still have a pair of testicles, keep the hat and the guns and be proud of who you are because they have already dismissed you, it's time to dismiss them.
Tell that to the blacks who wear baggy clothes and show up to job interviews.
Tell that to the Chimney Sweeps who attempt to get good tables at restaurants directly after work.
...
You are kidding yourself if you think that anyone is going to hear your points of view if you show up in attire that embraces the culture they already disdain. While en masse you might make the point on the spot, later the MSM will pick those 'come as you are artists' out of the crowd and you will see them all over the news as the new mascots for the reasons that they need to have gun control... its a double edged sword.
I dont think people need to wear their Sunday best, but showing up with confederate flags, open holsters, hostile t-shirts and signs is the last thing needed in the court of public opinion, which is just one of the many stagging grounds for the cause.
You are kidding yourself if you think that anyone is going to hear your points of view if you show up in attire that embraces the culture they already disdain.
We are talking about a cowboy hat here. Tell you what, I'll show up with my cowboy hat on and you can personally come to my face and tell me what you think of that. How does that sound?
How are you in any way shape or form under the impression that they do not already disdain law obiding gun owners?
I am not under that impression at all. Please re-read what I wrote. I am saying that showing up in a manner of dress or mannerism that enforces the mindset that they are already comfortable with in wielding to discriminate against you and hold your views in contempt; is likely not the best way to approach them.
I'm not saying you need to grab a suit and tie, shine your shoes and change who you are, I'm saying you need to be cognizant of your appearance for the venue.
Regardless, this discussion is taking away from the joy and push for change in this thread so I'll end my thoughts here. PM if you wish.
Aren't all chaps, by definition, assless? Just sayin'.
I will be there and I don't even live in that POS state.