Mass Firearms School in now offering Mass Basic Firearms Safety Classes taught in Spanish.
Click here for more information.
Click here for more information.
If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Be sure to enter the NES/MFS May Giveaway ***Canik METE SFX***
Mass Firearms School in now offering Mass Basic Firearms Safety Classes taught in Spanish.
Click here for more information.
In addition to my point above, if you want to own an item in America that can ultimately take the life of another human being, it should be YOUR responsibility to learn the national language, not the other way around.
Yes, they should.Wow, so the Second Amendment is reserved for English speakers? Maybe people should be required to demonstrate literacy before they're allowed to exercise their right to vote too.
Yes, they should.
You're bringing all of this to a ridiculous/overblown level. Chill out. Read the prior posts and take a look around. Undo your bunched panties.How about a tax to make sure that they're paying their fair share. You know, a tax, at the polls, so you can vote. Like a poll tax!
Wow, so the Second Amendment is reserved for English speakers? Maybe people should be required to demonstrate literacy before they're allowed to exercise their right to vote too.
You're bringing all of this to a ridiculous/overblown level. Chill out. Read the prior posts and take a look around. Undo your bunched panties.
No, its just carrying over from the 'press 2 for english' crap thats been going on for too long now. If youre in this country and intend to live here you need to learn the language, its english btw, and be able to read and write it also.
What exactly should I be seeing when I "look around"?
The right of self defense isn't limited to English speakers, or even citizens. What possible objection could anyone have to state mandated classes being taught in the language that is most effective for the students?
Furthermore, if someone learns handgun safety better because the class is taught in a language they're fluent in, they'll be better shooters, understand the laws better, understand safety better. It's a win all around.
The alternatives are either that non-English speakers can't defend themselves, or they take a course in English and barely learn the material. Both are bad.
Poll taxes and literacy tests for voting have been deemed unconstitutional a long time ago. Yea, better informed voters would be nice, but a literacy test is the wrong way to get there.
I think you just did.I love your facility and I'm not trying to start a firestorm here, but I don't agree with this at all. One reason why - if a person who can not speak english has a LTC-A and for some reason has interaction with the police (traffic stop, etc), it could be a bad scenario if the officer somehow sees the firearm. Unless the officer is bilingual, he can not communicate with a citizen who could ultimately be carrying a loaded firearm and someone could get hurt or even killed by what would ultimately be a misunderstanding/lack of communication.
Yes, they should.
It's not a win win. Read ALL posts and see my reasoning. I don't want someone I can't communicate with to be holding a loaded firearm in my country and I'm quite positive that I speak for the majority. If you want to enjoy the freedoms of this great country, then learn the national language. It's as simple as that. You are getting heated over nothing and regurgitating whatever some professor or newspaper told you instead of paying attention to actual safety concerns of your fellow, English speaking Americans. Other countries would not even give you the time of day, yet you want to defend anybody that steps foot on our soil. THAT is scary.
I think I under stand you. People should have to earn their rights in order to exercise them. Great.You're bringing all of this to a ridiculous/overblown level. Chill out. Read the prior posts and take a look around. Undo your bunched panties.
I understand your concern, but it is not sufficient to deny someone their rights. It plays nicely into the argument advanced by gun control types that the right to keep in bear arms is too dangerous to actually let people exercise.It's not a win win. Read ALL posts and see my reasoning. I don't want someone I can't communicate with to be holding a loaded firearm in my country and I'm quite positive that I speak for the majority. If you want to enjoy the freedoms of this great country, then learn the national language. It's as simple as that. You are getting heated over nothing and regurgitating whatever some professor or newspaper told you instead of paying attention to actual safety concerns of your fellow, English speaking Americans. Other countries would not even give you the time of day, yet you want to defend anybody that steps foot on our soil. THAT is scary.
I would love to find the chief that makes English literacy a requirement for an LTC. Even the SJC would crap all over that.If they can't speak english how are they gonna apply for a license in the first place? The Chief will tell them to screw.
Ok I'm done here. Boudrie and milktree will never agree with me and I will never agree with them. We can, however, agree to disagree and to have our own opinions. I'm just not going to keep arguing when it is not going to bring about any valid result.
No, its just carrying over from the 'press 2 for english' crap thats been going on for too long now. If youre in this country and intend to live here you need to learn the language, its english btw, and be able to read and write it also.
I would love to find the chief that makes English literacy a requirement for an LTC. Even the SJC would crap all over that.
Thank you. That's what I meant. And talking to the chief in spanish you would need a translator.I think his point was that simply filling out the application requires a working knowledge of English, not that there was a specific language requirement.
But maybe I misread that.
If they can't speak english how are they gonna apply for a license in the first place? The Chief will tell them to screw.
PM the one person that spoke about EBT, please. The rest of us were having a civilized argument without having to block our words which is a violation of the NES conduct policy. Oh, and Merry Christmas to you and yours.You think stereotyping someone who's Spanish as an ebt/welfare case is right? WTF? How about the guy who works to support his family and is stuck in a shitty part of town yet wants to protect his family? He's on the up and up and pays his bills, taxes and doesn't look to f anyone, just go to work and go home to his family. Maybe he met a mother ****er like some of you back in the day and was intimated and dropped out if school and never fully learned the proper way to dot his I's but can communicate. So f' him, and his family? I applaud them for offering this class. I bet there's a need or they wouldn't waste the $'s. I also bet if enough other different ethnicities went to them that they'd offer it to them also. Done. Merry Christmas!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
It's not a win win. Read ALL posts and see my reasoning. I don't want someone I can't communicate with to be holding a loaded firearm in my country and I'm quite positive that I speak for the majority. If you want to enjoy the freedoms of this great country, then learn the national language. It's as simple as that.