If you lose something there, I'm sure there would be someone to help you bend over and find it.
reported for sexual harassment.
If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Be sure to enter the NES/MFS May Giveaway ***Canik METE SFX***
If you lose something there, I'm sure there would be someone to help you bend over and find it.
This makes a lot of sense. Were you buying knee pads ?
As a matter of fact, I kneed to have them custom made extra thick, or I wind up dragging. I was picking up a mouth guard.
+1reported for sexual harassment.
No, you have intentionally misstated my answer: "another" and a "child" are not the same thing... Children hold a very strange and fluid place in our society with all adults being _more_ responsible for ensuring they don't come to harm than they are for some random adult. There is no black and white answer to that which gets back to WHY I OPPOSE LEGISLATING WHAT A JURY MUST DECIDE.So you do in fact think that in some cases a third party can be held liable for another's actions. Fascinating.
As a matter of fact, I kneed to have them custom made extra thick, or I wind up dragging. I was picking up a mouth guard.
You must have taken too many shots in the face.
Obviously you weren't buying a cup, but you should have picked up a helmet too. You must have taken too many shots in the face.
Yes, Dick Cheney is my lover.!!!!!
I appreciate the answer. It's really easy to be "intellectually honest" and answer the question and then say "but I'd never support a law.... blah blah" than to dodge it for a week.
So you do in fact think that in some cases a third party can be held liable for another's actions. Fascinating. That goes against every single other thing you've said on the issue. I'm sure you'll try to think of a way to refute that, but whatever.
So we've accomplished two things in the thread: That all rights an individual has may be violated by the government with your blessing as long as they apply due process, and that third parties can be held liable for the actions of others.
Thanks for clearing it up for me.
I think I'll take a break now for a bit if that's ok.
Fred?Can you name your logical fallacy?
While I agree with you, driving is a privilege, not a right. Comparing the privilege of driving, to the right of gun ownership, is a slippery slope.When you become crazy you lose that right. You forfeit the right when you become a nut, or mentally ill. You can't drive blind, so you shouldn't carry crazy.
While I agree with you, driving is a privilege, not a right. Comparing the privilege of driving, to the right of gun ownership, is a slippery slope.
While I agree with you, driving is a privilege, not a right. Comparing the privilege of driving, to the right of gun ownership, is a slippery slope.