Just put my renewal in with "ALP". No issues when I submitted. Grafton is still green!
If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Be sure to enter the NES/MFS May Giveaway ***Canik METE SFX***
Medfield
I remember that too, now it seems like they don't want you protecting your property.....Before ALP we used to just put Protection of life and property.
^Where are you getting this. That flies just fine in most towns.Have him read this: http://mafirearmsafety.com/2010/03/gun-sense-19-reason-letter-for-class-a-ltc/
For all lawful purposes no longer flies. Mine was a bit longer though.
The letter is not a statutory requirement. The PD cannot force someone to submit the letter and they can't deny someone a license for NOT providing a letter. A person's reason for requesting a license shouldn't be at issue at all. The ONLY thing that should be questioned is whether someone is qualified.It's a green town, but in the instructions for applying it specifically asks for a letter outlining your reasons for applying.
^Where are you getting this. That flies just fine in most towns.
The letter is not a statutory requirement. The PD cannot force someone to submit the letter and they can't deny someone a license for NOT providing a letter. A person's reason for requesting a license shouldn't be at issue at all. The ONLY thing that should be questioned is whether someone is qualified.
The only question is the lengths an applicant is willing to go to assert their rights under the law. (notice I didn't say Constitution here?) From vast experience, I've learned that everyone will just suck it up and do whatever their PD demands of them whether the PD has a legal basis for their requirement or not.
My town is green and it clearly states on their website that they will NOT accept for All Lawful Proposes anymore. This is just another back door plan to make it more difficult to get an unrestricted license in places that were never a problem before.
^Where are you getting this. That flies just fine in most towns.
The letter is not a statutory requirement. The PD cannot force someone to submit the letter and they can't deny someone a license for NOT providing a letter. A person's reason for requesting a license shouldn't be at issue at all. The ONLY thing that should be questioned is whether someone is qualified.
The only question is the lengths an applicant is willing to go to assert their rights under the law. (notice I didn't say Constitution here?) From vast experience, I've learned that everyone will just suck it up and do whatever their PD demands of them whether the PD has a legal basis for their requirement or not.
The best answer so far, after Knuckle Dragger's of course. The more you write, the more reasons the COP is going to have to restrict or deny you. It is a game that is played by a COP who doesn't believe that the general public has or needs the right to protect themselves outside of their home. Your chances of being labeled paranoid, a gun nut, wanting to play police officer, etc., go up exponentially with the more you write."For all lawful purposes, to buy, sell, use, carry, transfer, own and collect all large capacity pistols, rifles, and shotguns for use in hunting, sporting, competition, target shooting, collecting and personal protection."