• If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership  The benefits pay for the membership many times over.

"Just not true" that Obama/Clinton want to take guns

Joined
Feb 15, 2016
Messages
129
Likes
18
Feedback: 0 / 0 / 0
From a yahoo news article, Obama was challenged by a gun sore owner about him and Clinton confiscating guns and Obama replied that "it was just not true" that neither he nor Clinton were after our guns.........for what it's worth.......
 
While technically true. This is where he keeps himself as the smartest guy in the room.

It'll be a combination of alphabet soup guys knocking at your door when it happens. Not him or hildebeast. So he is "technically" telling you the truth.
 
He won't, and neither will Hillary outright ban all guns. Semi-auto's will get shifted to the NFA just like machine guns. Then it will be handguns. Ammo will have to meet EPA regs which means no lead - and the substitute metal will be deemed armor piercing.

Then the whole 'suitability' thing will come in like the folks on Social Security that have a financial proxy being on the chopping block. It will go to any misdemeanor make you a PP for life.

That conversation started with the gun shop owner asking when a Drunk Driver gets in trouble - we go after him, we don't make it harder for everyone else to by a car or a beer.
 
I can see them making it financially impossible to own a gun by taxes and surcharges on ammo and gun sales
 
The blessing is that we have the privilege of paying $20,000 annually for a high deductible health plan that provides a free physical.

sent via Samsung Galaxy S6
 
Last edited:
From a yahoo news article, Obama was challenged by a gun sore owner about him and Clinton confiscating guns and Obama replied that "it was just not true" that neither he nor Clinton were after our guns.........for what it's worth.......

It must be Saul Alinsky and he died in 1972!

There are 8 levels of control that must be obtained before you are able to create a social state. The first is the most important.
1) Healthcare
Control healthcare and you control the people
2) Poverty
Increase the Poverty level as high as possible, poor people are easier to control and will not fight back if you are providing everything for them to live.
3) Debt
Increase the debt to an unsustainable level. That way you are able to increase taxes, and this will produce more poverty.
4) Gun Control
Remove the ability to defend themselves from the Government. That way you are able to create a police state.
5) Welfare
Take control of every aspect of their lives (Food, Housing, and Income)
6) Education
Take control of what people read and listen to take control of what children learn in school.
7) Religion
Remove the belief in the God from the Government and schools
8) Class Warfare
Divide the people into the wealthy and the poor. This will cause more discontent and it will be easier to take (Tax) the wealthy with the support of the poor.
 
The media play softball by allowing the narrative to be about "confiscation", not about "banning" - as it is impossible to deny that they advocate the later, but the former can be denied until they get a lot closer to that goal.

Notice how questions posed about guns never ask about the ability to buy the most popular rifle in America, or their position on carry permits / constitutional CCW.

Just remember the 1999 Hildabeast robocall in Missouri before the CCW vote "just too gangerous for Missouri families"
 
Last edited:
Applies to Obama's gun confiscation denials just as well as healthcare ...

joseph_goebbels-if_u_tell_a_lie_big_enough.jpg
 
So hold on, is the insinuation that Obama and Hillary - the two pillars of honesty that stand tallest in DC - are lying about something?
 
Future tyrannical dictators (Trump?) will bemoan Obama (and possibly Hillary) for the increase in rate of gun ownership by the People.

Always a silver lining...
 
I can see them making it financially impossible to own a gun by taxes and surcharges on ammo and gun sales

Agreed. I honestly believe this is the strategy they will shift to. Ammo would hurt the most. Imagine a 10 or 20 cent per bullet tax? They'll sell it to the clueless public as similar to the tax on cigarettes and the sheep will think "oh 20 cents isn't alot nowadays, that's reasonable, it will help stop mass shootings". Result: we get f*cked.

The focus seems to be solely on Obama but he's just a puppet. I doubt he knows enough about firearms, Australia's gun laws, or even our own to make up his own mind. The people who pull these puppets' strings are the real enemy. Even worse, the braindead sheep who support this gun control crap are equal in blame.
 
Last edited:
It must be Saul Alinsky and he died in 1972!

There are 8 levels of control that must be obtained before you are able to create a social state. The first is the most important.
1) Healthcare
Control healthcare and you control the people
2) Poverty
Increase the Poverty level as high as possible, poor people are easier to control and will not fight back if you are providing everything for them to live.
3) Debt
Increase the debt to an unsustainable level. That way you are able to increase taxes, and this will produce more poverty.
4) Gun Control
Remove the ability to defend themselves from the Government. That way you are able to create a police state.
5) Welfare
Take control of every aspect of their lives (Food, Housing, and Income)
6) Education
Take control of what people read and listen to take control of what children learn in school.
7) Religion
Remove the belief in the God from the Government and schools
8) Class Warfare
Divide the people into the wealthy and the poor. This will cause more discontent and it will be easier to take (Tax) the wealthy with the support of the poor.


Where is he buried so I can piss on his grave?
 
Back
Top Bottom