Hi All,
I was reading an interesting story on the JPFO website (http://www.vcdl.org/Tonys/mcpd.html) about an incident in Virginia.
There was a line at the bottom of the page about open carry that made me think about MA law.
The comment was (at the end of the page under refrences):
Does anybody think we could get the same kind of turnout for opening a few peoples eyes in Massachusetts?
I can only hope.
Also, under the MA law (Chapter 140: Section 131) how is this for ambiguous bs: "use or carrying of such firearm as the licensing authority deems proper"
Who do we have to push in order to get a definition of what's 'proper'?
David
I was reading an interesting story on the JPFO website (http://www.vcdl.org/Tonys/mcpd.html) about an incident in Virginia.
There was a line at the bottom of the page about open carry that made me think about MA law.
The comment was (at the end of the page under refrences):
Virginia does NOT have a law authorizing "open carry" anymore than it has a law authorizing you to wear a red shirt or green pants. The key concept is "what isn't prohibited is therefore allowed". In Virginia, open carry is legal in most places with or without a Concealed Handgun Permit (CHP)
Does anybody think we could get the same kind of turnout for opening a few peoples eyes in Massachusetts?
I can only hope.
Also, under the MA law (Chapter 140: Section 131) how is this for ambiguous bs: "use or carrying of such firearm as the licensing authority deems proper"
Who do we have to push in order to get a definition of what's 'proper'?
David
Last edited: