If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Be sure to enter the NES/MFS May Giveaway ***Canik METE SFX***
Still our own worst enemy I see
Why the hate? Is it because he lives in an ultra-liberal city?
Does ones wealth preclude the right to self-preservation and protection? Is this guy forced to spend his money on 24hr security simply because a third party has determined he has enough money to pay for it?
We all live were we feel it is most advantageous to us personally. He is in THE center of commerce for the world, exactly where he wants to be. Should he be required to give up his security because he can afford to hire bodyguards? Or, is he not allowed to live where he chooses because he wants to keep himself safe?
This guy has a clear case of self-defense that, per Heller, is the crux of the 2nd Amendment and you guys are tossing him under the bus for being wealthy. Doesn't matter if the guy is rolling in money or riding his bike to collect cans, he has the God given right to defend himself, particularly true in his home.
4.5 pound yorkie, better than an alarm, no need to set it, just feed it.He needs a few more Yorkies to protect him . . .
The Curious Case of George Bardwil: How lawful self defense will get you arrested in NYC
There are some problems with this particular poster boy - he has a history of violence and domestic abuse, which make
him a prohibited person federally already.
the only thing that outrages me about this story is that a millionarie would want to continue to live in that dump NY. This is par for the course in NY.
It's not really all that surprising. If you're in the right business, NYC is the epicenter of money making. There are a lot of cities that suck, but they are excellent places for wealth generation. People make tradeoffs.
A person with the sort of wealth this guy has, should get zero sympathy. Yes NYC gun laws are restrictive, to say the least, but with his money and notoriety would have no problems obtaining the required permit. He will likely get off with a slap on the wrist and no record, due to his wealth, but the same could not be said for the average person in the same situation. Would be great if he joined the cause for 2nd Amendment Rights and help balance the playing field against the Bloomberg machine.
Oh I understand, but this guy is not in wealth generation, he's in wealth preservation phase. He has already made his millions, time to get out of dodge. Maybe now he'll see that his liberal elitist surroundings are a veritable hell on Earth.
he gets sympathy from me, dumb laws are dumb laws and everyone should ignore themYes, because the guy has enough money that he could have complied with the retarded gun laws with little or no hardship, so he gets zero sympathy when he has to endure the fallout of not even bothering to pay $430 to apply for a may-issue-if-you-donate-to-the-right-candidate license.
Usually when a rich guy gets away with breaking gun laws, it happens in a way that doesn't set any precendent for the rest of us, like how Scottie Pippen got Chicago to drop the gun charges, the rest of Chicago still had to wait a decade for things to change for the little guys.