So, good news. I got my thesis back and received an A- for the grade. I'm very happy about the teacher's objectivity.
Now, here's the thing. I was also nominated for the Kennedy award (best paper overall). He said though usually only flat A's are nominated, he thought it would be good to have a "right wing anti-gun-control paper in there". One of the restrictions, however, is that I have to cut my paper down to 4500 words. Currently it is 6,100 words, so I have to cut out quite a bit. I was just curious if you guys wouldn't mind giving some feedback on which parts would be the least damaging to the paper as a total. I have a few ideas of my own (gun control effects in Britain, the CDC study, etc.), but I was curious as to what the rest of the gun community thinks are the less important of the facts.
Here is an upload of the file - Thank you very much to Ken Maurer for the upload.
http://ken.strophyx.com/thesis289.pdf
Now, here's the thing. I was also nominated for the Kennedy award (best paper overall). He said though usually only flat A's are nominated, he thought it would be good to have a "right wing anti-gun-control paper in there". One of the restrictions, however, is that I have to cut my paper down to 4500 words. Currently it is 6,100 words, so I have to cut out quite a bit. I was just curious if you guys wouldn't mind giving some feedback on which parts would be the least damaging to the paper as a total. I have a few ideas of my own (gun control effects in Britain, the CDC study, etc.), but I was curious as to what the rest of the gun community thinks are the less important of the facts.
Here is an upload of the file - Thank you very much to Ken Maurer for the upload.
http://ken.strophyx.com/thesis289.pdf