If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Be sure to enter the NES/MFS May Giveaway ***Canik METE SFX***
You're both my hero's.....@Wickedcoolname explained it perfectly.
f*** that guy. Homeless guy got got. Play stupid games win stupid prizes. How ever you wanna put it. End of story.
Not sure about FBI, but I did see a plainclothes female U.S. Marshal take off her jacket in federal court. She had a Glock handgun (not sure of caliber) in a right hand draw holster, a spare mag in a carrier, a pair of handcuffs looped over the back of her belt and an ASP expandable baton on her left side. She definitely had a "less lethal" option available to her, right there on her belt.Dude was unarmed using bad words. In general, one cannot use a firearm in self defense against an unarmed aggressor unless there is a significant disparity in size, weight, even training. The FBI agent cannot claim he did not have the unarmed skills to handle this fool without going to gun first. A female agent? Sure. In fact female LEO's shoot more often than male LEO's.
A mere mortal civilian would be facing far more severe charges.
QFTMFT. You delivered.Defense can introduce the reputation of the "victim" as support for the claim the shooter was under attack, as evidence of "a pertinent trait of character of the victim.” " (this is distinct from the "Rape Shield" doctrine).
If remotely possible, the defense won't neglect to claim it.I suppose it is also possible that since both were regular subway riders, shooter may have encountered this aggressive panhandler previously?
(Bet the panhandler wishes he'd retreated).
Gotta be some places in America where bums still get the bum's rush.If we still arrested bums for vagrancy this never would have happened.
Whoa, that little nuance went straight over my head.The indictment names the man who was shot and also a second man, who it identifies as the victim of the reckless endangerment charge.sounds like the agent didn't give a f*** about what was beyond his target
f*** optics. Do the right thing.
To his bloated egoit's not clear what the threat was?
It'll come out in court, there's video from the train car, and also a 911 call from another passenger:it's not clear what the threat was?
FoxNews said:In a 911 call released in January, a witness said the agent had warned the man to back away, but the man ignored the command and instead prepared to fight him, the Washington Post reported. "The FBI agent said: ‘Move away. I’m an FBI agent. Back away,’" the 911 caller said. "The other gentleman didn’t, dropped his bag, approached him to fight him." The caller said the FBI agent was attacked by the other passenger but did not describe how.
To his bloated ego