If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Be sure to enter the NES/MFS May Giveaway ***Canik METE SFX***
Good one Twigg....TWATWAFFEL
I fully support the one gun per month proposal. My only question is how would it be implemented.
Would I get a voucher in the mail every month or would I get an EBT type card that would be replenished every month so I could pick up my new gun?
Twelve new guns per year? Hell yeah!
It could be if millionaires and billionaires paid their fair share. Gun ownership is a basic human right that should be paid for by the government.Ya, but you'll end up paying triple or more of your current taxes. There's no free lunches.
The bad and scary news is someone that thinks just like her will win the Dem nomination and have a far far better chance of getting into thevWH!The good news is that she has an ice cubes chance in hell of changing her address to Pennsylvania Ave.
God I hope she gets nominated. She’s un-electable. People in MA, NY, CA will vote for her but most of the country sees her as an idiot. And they’re right.
I heard something about Red Flag laws the other day that really struck me.
These laws are designed to remove firearms from people who are deemed to be an imminent danger to themselves or others.
Now I would think that anyone who is dangerous enough to forcibly disarm is also dangerous enough to at least put in protective custody, but apparently the way these laws work is that the cops show up at this so called "Imminent Dangers" home and demand his guns and, unless he resists them, they just take them then drive away, presumably after giving him a stern warning not to try any shit of course. After all they are there to arrest the firearms, not the person so as long as he cooperates with the removal the cops must leave this so called imminent danger, now feeling violated and extremely pissed off completely free to plot his revenge, or if he was a suicide risk looking another way to get the job done.
How is this supposed to actually work?
The bad and scary news is someone that thinks just like her will win the Dem nomination and have a far far better chance of getting into thevWH!
Pocahontas say "NO firestick for you!"
I heard something about Red Flag laws the other day that really struck me.
These laws are designed to remove firearms from people who are deemed to be an imminent danger to themselves or others.
Now I would think that anyone who is dangerous enough to forcibly disarm is also dangerous enough to at least put in protective custody, but apparently the way these laws work is that the cops show up at this so called "Imminent Dangers" home and demand his guns and, unless he resists them, they just take them then drive away, presumably after giving him a stern warning not to try any shit of course. After all they are there to arrest the firearms, not the person so as long as he cooperates with the removal the cops must leave this so called imminent danger, now feeling violated and extremely pissed off completely free to plot his revenge, or if he was a suicide risk looking another way to get the job done.
How is this supposed to actually work?
- Establishing a real waiting period. Waiting periods prevent impulsive gun violence, reducing gun suicides by 7–11% and gun homicides by 17%. Over the past 5 years, a national handgun waiting period would have stopped at least 4,550 gun deaths.
The fake Indian picked the wrong week to gain traction with this big rollout of b.s.
The Epstein story is going silence this crap for a while.
And by then she will come up with a another big free sss#t giveaway to try to buy votes.