You can give them to me, I am familiar with ASTM, ISO and lots of other specifications as I have to deal with them (including test equipment) all day. So instead of crapping on people, if you are such an expert, why don't you calmly explain why you are such an expert on abrasion testing. I'll point out a couple of things to you.
The test was performed to an ASTM standard test method - meaning that the same test was performed the under the same conditions for multiple samples. This allows you to compare abrasion resistance of multiple coatings, or finishes, under the same conditions to get relative results. While it was developed for paints they are all coatings so I don't think it is total bullshit at all. However it is a marketing piece, and everyone should keep this in mind.
They normalize the test results in cycles/mil of coating thickness so they account for the thickness of the coatings, contrary to your statements (I guess you didn't even watch the video).
They only talk about abrasion resistance, so your statements about impact resistance are out of context. I still can't tell from your angry, abusive posts if you think one product is better than the other or why.
Your analogy to slacks rubbing together is completely nonsensical as this test would never be used to test fabrics.
Your attitude really sucks, you can make valid points in a discussion without the bullshit personal attacks. I want you to post what your credentials and experience are to determine if you are a Google genius, or you actually know what you are talking about.
It is a great video when you realize that ASTM D4060 is an abrasion test for Organic Coatings
Which. Are. Shit.
If you owned the ASTM spec (which is meant for paint, btw) you would know that you are using a taber tester on such a low weight that it's absolute horseshit. This spec is for paint, and cerakote is ceramic. This will simulate what is essentially your slacks rubbing on your testing surface with your erection on the other side. The specified pressure and friction is relatively harmless.
The fact that none of the other coating thicknesses are defines in this bullshit video raises eyebrows. Do you know how many microns of gunkote was applied in relaiton to this 6k pass Cerakote application?
Don't believe the hype. Is cerakote great for "Docker's Slacks" abrasion wear? yes. But is it exponentially better for impact resistance? Scratching from hard surfaces? Resistance to real-world abuse?
ASTM D4060 does not depict this adequately. So your video sucks a bag full of male reproductive organs.
bullshit tends to get squashed easily by competent boots.
If I gave you an ISO spec # or a SAE standard, would you know what it meant? No, you wouldn't.