IPSC_DRL
NES Member
"there but for the grace of the FSM go I"
Just remember Chief Wiggim's classic line![]()
You Pastafarians crack me up!
![Laugh at above [laugh2] [laugh2]](/xen/styles/default/xenforo/smilies.vb/014.gif)
![ROFL [rofl] [rofl]](/xen/styles/default/xenforo/smilies.vb/013.gif)
![Laugh [laugh] [laugh]](/xen/styles/default/xenforo/smilies.vb/012.gif)

If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
"there but for the grace of the FSM go I"
Just remember Chief Wiggim's classic line![]()
I usually stop when I get home, hopefully not sooner.![]()
Is this "case law"? What case? Any chance of reversing that?(according to the MA court that established there was no implied .08 cutoff for CUI)
I'll look for the site, could not find it quickly.Is this "case law"? What case? Any chance of reversing that?
It sounds logical. I think then you should logically conclude those people should not be allowed to vote and do grocery shopping as well. War to drunks, let em starve. Right?OUI is not a minor offense. It is very serious. if You ever lose a loved one to a drunk driver you would understand. These drunk people need be stopped before they harm any one. I agree if a person is a drunk they are unsuitable. want to own a gun? dont consume alcohol and drive
It would do more to enhance public safety to do a lifetime driving license ban (not that I am advocating it), since far more OUI convicts go on to subsequent offenses than do something dangerous with a gun when intoxicated. But, that would be messing with a right(*) that nearly everyone can empathize with.It sounds logical. I think then you should logically conclude those people should not be allowed to vote and do grocery shopping as well. War to drunks, let em starve. Right?
It wouldn't matter, they would continue to drive without a license.It would do more to enhance public safety to do a lifetime driving license ban (not that I am advocating it), since far more OUI convicts go on to subsequent offenses than do something dangerous with a gun when intoxicated. But, that would be messing with a right(*) that nearly everyone can empathize with.
(*) - Yeah, I know the state tries to gaslight us into believing it is a "privilege", but there would be near riots if they started treating it that way, as in "you have a reputation as a bad driver; you were arrested for OUI but found not guity; etc. and are thus unsuitable".
The hits just keep on coming. Chalk another win up for Jason in DCJIS v. DuPont et. al.
This is an easy and worthwhile read that neatly wraps up the issue. Getting the FLRB to start doing their job again and getting state licenses back to folks who have had their rights restored (read the decision) is a huge step forward.
Look for an update when/if the state decides to appeal this or the Capono decision.