If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Be sure to enter the NES/MFS March Giveaway ***Taurus G3c***
That didn't take long.
You’re cute.
I find your inclination to destroy historical artifacts as disturbing as finding a bandaid in my food at a restaurant.
May you never come into possession of anything historically significant for you to ruin.
Yessss... someone else who gets it.I think one has to make the distinction on whether the item is "historically significant". I.e., restoring the gun that Hitler used to commit suicide would be a definite no-no. More value historically as-is, than refurbed.
a beat up, one in 5.4 Million Garand that has no documented history.... sure.. maybe put a nice new walnut stock on it, and a new barrel.. polish it up nice.. do what you want with it...
much like antique cars... often worth more restored than as-is, unless there's some documented historical significance.
M1 Carbine, old Marlin 80, a Japanese Arisaka, plus some others. End of the day, just want to know whether or not its healthy to shoot or to just to mount.What type of firearm do you have?
I don't see him, do you have his contacts?Depends on the gun…. What is it?
Assuming US (Garand, 1903a3, M1 Carbine, 1911a1), I think Harry at Noah’s Motorsports is your man. If you are willing to ship, there are lots of other options.
M1 Carbine, old Marlin 80, a Japanese Arisaka, plus some others. End of the day, just want to know whether or not its healthy to shoot or to just to mount.
I don't see him, do you have his contacts?
Who said restoring a gun is always destroying it as an historical artifact? There are quite a few degrees of restoration.You’re cute.
I find your inclination to destroy historical artifacts as disturbing as finding a bandaid in my food at a restaurant.
May you never come into possession of anything historically significant for you to ruin.
Who said restoring a gun is always destroying it as an historical artifact? There are quite a few degrees of restoration.
Who made you the expert on degrees of restoration?
Obviously not serious. If something is destroyed or not of particular historical significance, have at it.
I personally own a 1903a1 sniper clone that was made from a 900,000 Springfield receiver and retrofitted for the 8x scope.
If restoring means ‘modifying for the purpose of making it useful again’, I’m 100% on board. My 1903a1 is a tack driver and will give all of my modern rifles a run for their money.
Who said restoring a gun is always destroying it as an historical artifact? There are quite a few degrees of restoration.
This all dayI think one has to make the distinction on whether the item is "historically significant". I.e., restoring the gun that Hitler used to commit suicide would be a definite no-no. More value historically as-is, than refurbed.
a beat up, one in 5.4 Million Garand that has no documented history.... sure.. maybe put a nice new walnut stock on it, and a new barrel.. polish it up nice.. do what you want with it...
much like antique cars... often worth more restored than as-is, unless there's some documented historical significance.
Restoring is not destroying.You’re cute.
I find your inclination to destroy historical artifacts as disturbing as finding a bandaid in my food at a restaurant.
May you never come into possession of anything historically significant for you to ruin.