dcmdon
NES Member
If you read the first page of this, it seems like they finally get it.
However, then on the next 2 pages he seemingly contradicts himself and completely muddies things up.
The police are supposed to use this for guidance. If you were a police chief in CT, would you be confused???
Either way. It unequivocally acknowledges that OC is legal. The "mud" is around whether the officer can lawfully stop and identify you.
Thankfully, most cops won't read past the first page since their eyes will glaze over once he starts making references to case law.
http://ctcarry.com/Document/Download/492deac4-1b08-45d1-b8c5-fe4b3cbb62d3
However, then on the next 2 pages he seemingly contradicts himself and completely muddies things up.
The police are supposed to use this for guidance. If you were a police chief in CT, would you be confused???
Either way. It unequivocally acknowledges that OC is legal. The "mud" is around whether the officer can lawfully stop and identify you.
Thankfully, most cops won't read past the first page since their eyes will glaze over once he starts making references to case law.
http://ctcarry.com/Document/Download/492deac4-1b08-45d1-b8c5-fe4b3cbb62d3