Boston Globe op-ed calls for doxxing all gun owners, which would give criminals real-time intelligence on where to steal firearms

[fl4848]

Boston Globe op-ed calls for doxxing all gun owners, which would give criminals real-time intelligence on where to steal firearms​

Insanity: Boston Globe op-ed calls for doxxing all gun owners, which would give criminals real-time intelligence on where to steal firearms

A recent op-ed in the Boston Globe calls for doxxing people who own guns for 'public safety purposes,' though in fact, alerting area residents to where the guns are in communities would no doubt significantly increase gun thefts and in a quick minute. The paper's editorial board re

www.naturalnews.com

Here's the Globe article. I can't see it, because I don't subscribe to left-wing filth:

Should you know if your neighbor owns a gun? - The Boston Globe

The Winthrop case highlights the importance of knowing where and how gun-owners obtained a permit.

www.bostonglobe.com

 

[Marty McFly]

Yeah naw. f*** them

 

[nutsym16]

The globe tried this years ago .Got shot down. Let the thiefs steal them the old fashioned way, without a list

 

[whacko]

From the globe article:
"How do you balance the public’s right to know if their neighbors own guns vs. gun owners’ privacy rights?”

Dear globe.....kindly quote the section of the constitution that guarantees the right to know what your neighbors f***ing own.

 

[Joker_114th]

And yet another reason why I'm against registration.........

 

[Jim Poulette]

Smells like the Globe's been brushing up on their Marxism.

Actually the oldest trick in the book: Create anarchy, then quell by tyranny. Win-win.

 

[rosco61]

I think we should dox them. I'm sure the local criminals would love some of their stuff.
And if the editorial board gets shot during the robbery. Win win!

 

[SpaceCritter]

Have they learned nothing from their colleagues in New York?

Newspaper That Published Gun-Owner Addresses Gets Its Staff's Info Outed

Yesterday we told you about the interactive map of local gun owners published by the Journal-News, a newspaper serving the Westchester and Rockland counties of New York, and the outcry it immediately drew. Turns out the stunt was so unpopular — with gun owners and privacy advocates alike — that...

news.yahoo.com

 

[steven grammont]

Boston Globe = Liberal rag sheet

 

[Mesatchornug]

Hey look, yet another DUPE

Should you know if your neighbor owns a gun?

https://www.bostonglobe.com/2021/07/03/opinion/should-you-know-if-your-neighbor-owns-gun/ Attached a pdf of the article since its behind a paywall

www.northeastshooters.com

 

[Bt74]

Hey look, yet another DUPE

Should you know if your neighbor owns a gun?

https://www.bostonglobe.com/2021/07/03/opinion/should-you-know-if-your-neighbor-owns-gun/ Attached a pdf of the article since its behind a paywall

www.northeastshooters.com

No shit.

 

[71montess]

This is proposed so there the Army of liberal Doxers will delve into the online history and pull up incendiary posts of said gun owners. Racist and whatnot.

 

[DitchDigger]

I wouldn’t pick up dog sh#t with that rag,,,,,,
are the Globe op-ed’s designed to out the totally insane fools associated with the rag sheet,,,,

 

[FiremanBob]

The propaganda outlet is not writing for you. They are writing for the leftard dupes who consider themselves "normal liberals", shaping their opinions of you domestic terrorists, so that they will support legislation and regulations which meet the goals of the DemComs.

As usual, Matt Bracken explained the process clearly in this article: The Digital Gulag: Why Team Tyranny Won’t Need Door-Kickers to Enforce the Coming Gun Bans

 

[seanc]

They try this every couple of years. Until one of their reporters’ addresses gets published. Then they squeal and realize doing things like this could be a bad idea.

 

[Dennis in MA]

Meh. Do we expect anything else from the Glob???? Funny how, by and large, the 2A community is rabbidly 1A protective. Yet the 1A community is, by and large, rabbidly anti-2A.

Some. Ting. Wong.

(Of course, their reasoning for both is that "it's always been that way" instead of "it's in the Constitution." I mean, if we F'd cows but only on Sunday and someone wanted to ban it, expand it or change it to only Saturdays, the Glob editorial board would be up in arms.)

 

[Mesatchornug]

Meh. Do we expect anything else from the Glob???? Funny how, by and large, the 2A community is rabbidly 1A protective. Yet the 1A community is, by and large, rabbidly anti-2A.

Some. Ting. Wong.

(Of course, their reasoning for both is that "it's always been that way" instead of "it's in the Constitution." I mean, if we F'd cows but only on Sunday and someone wanted to ban it, expand it or change it to only Saturdays, the Glob editorial board would be up in arms.)

I wouldn't call modern journalists the "1A community." They benefit from the protections of the First Amendment, but they don't fight to keep or expand the same. Hell, half of them are pro- "hate speech" and "revenge porn" laws, and they all love to misquote "fire in a crowded theater." That's not really someone I want in my foxhole.

 

[Gidge]

The globalists keep poking the bear ... they will lose in the end.

They're doing the same with the new strain of covid, when you over play your hand you'll be beat once everyone has had enough pain and suffering (e.g. Hitlers "Thousand Year Reich" only lasted 12 years ).

Yeah, that Boston Glob rag isn't even good enough for toilet paper.

 

[Jsfitzgerald85]

I wouldn't call modern journalists the "1A community." They benefit from the protections of the First Amendment, but they don't fight to keep or expand the same. Hell, half of them are pro- "hate speech" and "revenge porn" laws, and they all love to misquote "fire in a crowded theater." That's not really someone I want in my foxhole.

Free speech for me, not for thee

 

[Asaltweapon]

The globalists keep poking the bear ... they will lose in the end.

Yeah, that Boston Glob rag isn't even good enough for toilet paper.

Makes for a good bird cage liner but would spoil fresh fish if used as a wrap.

 

[Mesatchornug]

Free speech for me, not for thee

Right. It's the Fudd-ism of 1A advocacy: "I support the First Amendment, but..."

 

[Jsfitzgerald85]

Right. It's the Fudd-ism of 1A advocacy: "I support the First Amendment, but..."

Pretty much

 

[SpaceCritter]

Right. It's the Fudd-ism of 1A advocacy: "I support the First Amendment, but..."

It isn't merely FUDDism, they fancy themselves information gatekeepers.

 

[Mesatchornug]

It isn't merely FUDDism, they fancy themselves information gatekeepers.

And this is distinct from the below in which way?

I must be living in a vacuum. The guides on our hunt tell me that the use of AR and AK rifles have a rapidly growing following among hunters, especially prairie dog hunters. I had no clue. Only once in my life have I ever seen anyone using one of these firearms.

I call them "assault" rifles, which may upset some people. Excuse me, maybe I'm a traditionalist, but I see no place for these weapons among our hunting fraternity. I'll go so far as to call them "terrorist" rifles. They tell me that some companies are producing assault rifles that are "tackdrivers."

Sorry, folks, in my humble opinion, these things have no place in hunting. We don't need to be lumped into the group of people who terrorize the world with them, which is an obvious concern. I've always been comfortable with the statement that hunters don't use assault rifles. We've always been proud of our "sporting firearms."

This really has me concerned. As hunters, we don't need the image of walking around the woods carrying one of these weapons. To most of the public, an assault rifle is a terrifying thing. Let's divorce ourselves from them. I say game departments should ban them from the praries [sic] and woods.[3]

(edited for his actual quote)

 

[Dennis in MA]

I wouldn't call modern journalists the "1A community." They benefit from the protections of the First Amendment, but they don't fight to keep or expand the same. Hell, half of them are pro- "hate speech" and "revenge porn" laws, and they all love to misquote "fire in a crowded theater." That's not really someone I want in my foxhole.

That's my point. They hide behind 1A but have no idea what it means or anything.

 

[Mesatchornug]

That's my point. They hide behind 1A but have no idea what it means or anything.

Sure. I guess my point is that they're not really the 1A community at that point though.

But maybe we're trying to say the same things in different ways?

 

[fl4848]

Have they learned nothing from their colleagues in New York?

Newspaper That Published Gun-Owner Addresses Gets Its Staff's Info Outed

Yesterday we told you about the interactive map of local gun owners published by the Journal-News, a newspaper serving the Westchester and Rockland counties of New York, and the outcry it immediately drew. Turns out the stunt was so unpopular — with gun owners and privacy advocates alike — that...

news.yahoo.com

I think this is appropriate action to take. Maybe we dox the Boston Globe reporters? Eye for an eye, says the Bible.

 

[fl4848]

“How do you balance the public’s right to know if their neighbors own guns vs. gun owners’ privacy rights?”

That's simple. The public HAS NO right to know.

 

[fl4848]

I think this is appropriate action to take. Maybe we dox the Boston Globe reporters? Eye for an eye, says the Bible.

OK, it looks like they name the "Editorial Board" as the author of that article. They don't want to get doxxed by gun owners for some reason. Maybe we just dox the owner of the Globe who condones these types of articles.

The Boston Globe - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

John W. Henry - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Brian McGrory - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

 

[fl4848]

Brian McGrory has written pleasant novels such as Strangled, about the Boston Strangler. How nice.