If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Be sure to enter the NES/MFS June Giveaway ***Keltec SUB2000***
Actually the original law should be the law of the land.
"You go to a rural area, where guns are part of the culture, (and) to impose laws from Washington that are going to work in New York City, or work in a rural area, makes no sense.”
What you fail to understand is that the 2nd amendment is the only reason we can still own firearms...Is that how its worked with CCW over the last couple decades?
Clearly not
What you fail to comprehend is that the BOR is a limitation on the powers granted to the federal gov
Its also why most states have a 2A equiv written into their constitutions
Fed Gov was always intended to be the junior partner in the relationship
Let me ask you a question.Maybe you would care to flesh that argument out a bit and demonstrate to everyone why that is
Seems to me that prior to Heller/McDonald ownership/possession wasnt in any immenent threat of confiscation
Almost every state has its equivalent RKBA clause/protection
Politicians historically have run from gun control after voters slap them silly at the polls
Seems to me that its voters that guarantee RKBA not 2A
If follks have learned nothing else they should observe that the supreme court FOLLOWS popular opinion on most every ruling they carefully cherry pick from applicants
Given record sales for nearly a decade and popular opinion clearly behind RKBA what do you think is going to happen.
The problem though is that too many people are too poorly educated in which level of gov the Constitution makes as the junior partner in the deal......