- Joined
- Aug 28, 2010
- Messages
- 99
- Likes
- 14
http://www.examiner.com/article/con...anti-american-for-questioning-gun-control-law According to him he is the master.
If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Be sure to enter the NES/MFS May Giveaway ***Canik METE SFX***
Since registration was never required in CT, How do they know who to mail letters to regarding Firearms and specifically High capacity magazines?
They will access the 4473's I'm sure. But for the mags? Just get lucky I quess cuz there's no trail when ya bought a mag.
Isn't there some law against them using it like that though? They would have to go to every dealer and look through their files and take notes.
Dorner had the right idea
Isn't there some law against them using it like that though? They would have to go to every dealer and look through their files and take notes.
They'll change the law I'm sure...
ahh yes, questioning tyranny is the hallmark of anti-Americanism.
There's also a "law" saying something along the lines of "and shall not be infringed" and we all know how well that one's working...Isn't there some law against them using it like that though? They would have to go to every dealer and look through their files and take notes.
There's also a "law" saying something along the lines of "and shall not be infringed" and we all know how well that one's working...
Since registration was never required in CT, How do they know who to mail letters to regarding Firearms and specifically High capacity magazines?
Since registration was never required in CT, How do they know who to mail letters to regarding Firearms and specifically High capacity magazines?
Im amazed he isn't going after her for recording the conversation.
Im amazed he isn't going after her for recording the conversation.
He probably didn't think of it at the time.
Im amazed he isn't going after her for recording the conversation.
He probably didn't think of it at the time.
When must you get permission from everyone involved before recording?
Twelve states require the consent of every party to a phone call or conversation in order to make the recording lawful. These "two-party consent" laws have been adopted in California, Connecticut, Florida, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire, Pennsylvania and Washington (Hawai'i is also in general a one-party state, but requires two-party consent if the recording device is installed in a private place). Although they are referred to as "two-party consent" laws, consent must be obtained from every party to a phone call or conversation if it involves more than two people. In some of these states, it might be enough if all parties to the call or conversation know that you are recording and proceed with the communication anyway, even if they do not voice explicit consent. See the State Law: Recording section of this legal guide for information on specific states' wiretapping laws.