I don't think I previously responded and I didn't see my name above, so:
I have only used as-cast 0.357-0.358" cast lead bullets in all my 9x19s for about 35 years now and never had a problem. Have gone through using a Lubri-Sizer with 0.358" sizing die to pan lubing to tumble lubing. I prefer the speed and simplicity of tumble lube. A very light coat of LLA or White Label 45/45/10 is all you need. You should barely even see the lube on the bullets. The good thing about LLA is that it works sort of like coated bullets. If I have bullets that lead the bore, a light tumble lube in LLA will eliminate all or most leading--a very tenacious coating (in fact, I think that it succeeds not by being a lube but by being a coating).
For most of us, leading is generally due to the bullet being too small for the barrel (and that means that 0.001" over groove diameter is not always enough) or the bullets are too hard. A bullet that is 18-22 BHN is too hard. A bullet that is around 8-12 BHN is perfect for 9x19.
If one worries about pressure, that is taken care of by working up the load from the start load. I have never seen any difference in charge weight, but you may find something different.
Likewise, 0.357" jacketed bullets have always worked quite well for me—and were about all you could find in the early '70s.
I do think that 0.357" is better in almost all 9x19s than 0.356", no matter if the groove diameter is 0.354-0.355"— and 0.358" is just as good.
To go the other way, Mike Venturino (spelling?) uses type-metal and sizes to groove diameter for all his semi-auto and full-auto pistol cartridge guns. Works for him and he has probably tens of thousands of cast bullets on me and is a much greater expert than I could ever hope to be, but when I try his method, I get leading in the bore and find it to be a total waste of type-metal.
Thus, you need to experiment to find what works for you.