Totally agree. As I read more about the initial confrontation, I'm reminded of the tactics debate between the Marine Corps and the Army in the Pacific in WWII. The Marines held that aggression and speed saved lives in the long run. The Army's inclination was to be more slow and methodical. The initial contact had officers taking fire, but was the suspect accessible to them at that point? Could they have taken him if they had tried? I read about this locked door, but I don't think I quite have the tactical scenario sorted out. Was the locked door an issue during the initial confrontation or only later? There are windows on the outside. They probably didn't have what they needed to breach, but could they not have engaged the shooter's attention? I'm not asking you in particular, but this thread seems to be more about woulda, coulda, shoulda (when it isn't about gun control), and I'd like to understand that the tactical situation better.