• If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership  The benefits pay for the membership many times over.

What a Colossal Waste of Resources – More Gun Violence Studies

GOAL

NES Member
Joined
Nov 21, 2007
Messages
541
Likes
1,747
Feedback: 0 / 0 / 0
What a Colossal Waste of Resources – More Gun Violence Studies

1612197210961.png

Gun Owners’ Action League (GOAL) was recently made aware that a bill is being filed this legislative session to establish the Commonwealth of Massachusetts Firearm Violence Institute. The bill, An Act Establishing an Institute Within the Department of Public Health filed by State Representative David Linsky, would create this new agency with a fifteen member executive committee. The supposed purpose is to study “gun violence”.

This has been a national effort of the anti-civil rights crowd on the national level for many years. They have fought to reinstitute the funding that previously went to the Center for Disease Control (CDC) for “gun violence studies”. Their funding was eliminated years ago when it became obvious that they were producing greatly flawed information for political reasons.

Over the years, GOAL has been approached by several groups asking if we would support these studies. Our constant answer has been: What is it exactly that you need to study? Bad people get guns illegally and hurt good people. The bulk of it surrounds the illicit drug trade. What is there to study? We never get a good answer than “it simply makes sense to study gun violence”.

Two years ago GOAL released our report on the failure of Massachusetts gun control laws. It used the government’s own data and proved beyond any debate that the gun control laws of the Commonwealth have been an abject failure. No one to date has been able to dispute, or even tried to dispute, our findings. The major media networks refused to cover it although it should have been the public safety story of the decade for Massachusetts. So again, what is it they want to study?

The bottom line is that these efforts can only be viewed two ways. First, these are used as a stalling tactic. We already know the problems and the answers to the problems, but as long as they keep calling for more studies nothing actually has to be done to address the real issues.

Second, they will under no circumstances admit that “gun control” laws don’t, and won’t, work. So they will continue to try to find someone, or some contrived agency, that will provide them with the answers they want.

Hopefully this bill will find the bottom of a recycling bin somewhere and we can move on to solving the real issues we already know exist.



An Act establishing an institute within the Department of Public Health

Chapter 140 of the General Laws is hereby amended by inserting after Section 131 the following section:-

Section 1317/8. The governor shall establish the Commonwealth of Massachusetts firearm violence institute, herein referred to as the institute, within the department of public health subject to appropriations. The purposes of the institute shall include: (1) advising the governor, governmental agencies, and the legislature on matters relating to firearm violence in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts; (2) fostering, pursuing, and sponsoring collaborative firearm violence research; (3) increasing understanding by establishing reporting on what is known and what is not known about firearm violence of the state; (4) identifying priority needs for firearm violence research and inventory work within the Commonwealth of Massachusetts that currently are not receiving adequate attention, and identifying public or private entities that are best situated to address such needs, thereby leading to better coordination of firearm violence research efforts in the state; (5) promoting awareness of existing and new sources of firearm violence information and firearm violence while educating the elected officials, governmental agencies, and the general public on firearm violence issues through such means as it may determine; (6) organizing and sponsoring meetings on firearm violence topics; (7) raising sensitivity to firearm violence concerns among state and local government agencies, and serving as a forum for enhanced interagency information sharing and cooperation; (8) working on a continuing basis with policymakers in the legislature and state agencies to identify, implement, and evaluate innovative firearm violence prevention policies and programs; (9) supplementing its own research by administering a small grants program for research on firearm violence, which shall be awarded on the basis of scientific merit as determined by an open, competitive peer review process that assures objectivity, consistency, and high quality; and (10) providing copies of their research publications to the legislature and to agencies supplying data used in the conduct of such research as soon as is practicable following publication. The institute shall be guided by an executive committee, which shall consist of 15 members, 1 of whom will be the commissioner of the department of criminal justice information services or their designee, 1 of whom will be the commissioner of the department of public health or their designee, 7 of whom will be at large members appointed by the governor whereby 1 of whom shall be chairperson, 2 of whom will be appointed by the president of the senate, 1 of whom shall be appointed by the minority leader of the senate, 2 of whom shall be appointed by the speaker of the house, and 1 of whom shall be appointed by the minority leader of the house. Appointed members shall serve for a term of 3 years, provided that such members may be reappointed. The institute shall have a director who shall be appointed by the executive committee and shall after appointment be an employee of the department of public health. The institute director shall serve at the pleasure of the executive committee and serve as the chief administrative officer of the institute and provide the necessary support for the executive committee. The executive committee shall: (1) adopt policies, procedures, and criteria governing the programs and operations of the institute; (2) recommend to the governor and legislature appropriate actions to deal with firearm violence within the state; (3) develop and implement the research, education, and information transfer programs of the institute; (4) identify and rate proposals for firearm violence research; and (5) meet publicly at least twice a year, giving at least 2 weeks notice prior to each meeting. The institute shall foster, pursue, and sponsor basic, translational, and transformative research, field studies, and all other such activities to research: (1) the nature of firearm violence, including individual and societal determinants of risk for involvement in firearm violence, whether as a victim or a perpetrator; (2) the individual, community, and societal consequences of firearm violence; (3) the prevention and treatment of firearm violence at the individual, community, and societal levels; and (4) the effectiveness of existing laws and policies intended to reduce firearm violence, including the criminal misuse of firearms, and efforts to promote responsible ownership and use of firearms. The institute shall foster the collection, transfer, and application of firearm violence information in the state by fostering access, compatibility, interchange, and synthesis of data about firearm violence maintained by public entities, academic and research institutions, and private organizations. The institute shall prepare and submit a report every year to the governor and the legislature describing programs undertaken or sponsored by the institute, the status of knowledge regarding the state’s firearm violence, and research needs related thereto.
 
Just like they try to Blame NH for their Crime Rates because we don't have very many gun laws.

If that were the case, then NH would have a higher Crime Rate then Mass. Statistically,
Maine, Vermont and Hew Hampshire have consistently been at the top of the list for
Safest States to live in.

Malodave
 
It may be a good idea to attach $$$ to these ideas. That "executive committee" won't be cheap. Let's figure out the budget we are talking about and let tax payers know exactly how much we are paying these leaches. That may hit the nerve better than logic.

Also, Linsky. The guy is a serial bullshit bill writer, he does this non-stop and many, (in part thanks to GOAL) don't go anywhere. It would be really helpful to crunch the numbers on how much time is wasted by filing these frivolous bills that waste time and at the rates our politicians charging us, it's not cheap. Cold hard numbers go better than pure logic, no matter how convincing it is.
 
Another 500 page “Cadillac” of gun violence studies conducted by some supposed brainiac in some supposed institution of higher learning that on the last page concludes that everything stated in the previous 499 pages can never be actually proven. The end.
 
A search of the biomedical literature in PubMed on the simple phrase “gun violence” shows publications surged immensely DURING TRUMP. Who paid for this surge? A few paltry $10s of millions from the government, and the vast amount from Bloomberg, Soros and Richie Rich anti-gun progressives. The cash is laundered through Joyce Foundation, MacArthur Foundation, Everytown, Giffords, and comes from numerous multi-b(m)illionaire “globalists” who want to save the US from our fascination with guns, liberty, freedom and other such antiquated values.

2021 is off to a good start with a higher bar than ever expected.

4258B1CB-C019-44AD-A556-FC85EF19559E.jpeg
 
Last edited:
Pissing money away to hire their friends.

What are some of you saying? "Give the money back to the citizens?" ... is that what I hear? ...

24002aae977f78561f9b4ceb77fb16bd.jpg
 
Back
Top Bottom