• If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership  The benefits pay for the membership many times over.

Vortex SPARC II verse Vortex SPARC AR

There is a more expensive version with a prismatic optic system that my AR guru has advised is better for precise shots at distance.
 
Yup.

I was thinking of the 1x. 399 list; $299 MAP (min advertised price allowed by Vortex); sometimes available for less on Amazon.

It has a 3moa dot vs a 2moa dot so it will obscure more of the target. Although the additional reticle rings might help to hit targets ?
 
http://www.primaryarms.com/spr-200/p/spr-200/

I have one of these. The center dot is 1moa I believe. I can't quickly find literature confirming that but it's certainly not 3moa. My aimpoint is 2moa and the center dot on the Vortex is smaller.

Either way, I like this style of optic over a conventional red dot because the red dots seem to starburst on me from time to time. This etched design agrees with my eyes more.

I had an original sparc. it worked great but i had to send it back for a battery door issue. sent it out on monday and had a new one by thursday. the second one had zero issues for a couple of years before selling it.
 
http://www.primaryarms.com/spr-200/p/spr-200/

I have one of these. The center dot is 1moa I believe. I can't quickly find literature confirming that but it's certainly not 3moa. My aimpoint is 2moa and the center dot on the Vortex is smaller.

Either way, I like this style of optic over a conventional red dot because the red dots seem to starburst on me from time to time. This etched design agrees with my eyes more.

I had an original sparc. it worked great but i had to send it back for a battery door issue. sent it out on monday and had a new one by thursday. the second one had zero issues for a couple of years before selling it.

The spit fire per vortex web site with the DRT reticle states 3moa dot.? Simple see how many inches it covers at 25 feet a 3 moa dot will cover about 1/4" this is 1x .... good manufactures will tell you at what MagX the reticle subtension
Spit fire with EBR
http://www.vortexoptics.com/uploads/sub_spf_3x_ebr-556b_moa-t.jpg
Spitfire DRT ret.
http://www.vortexoptics.com/uploads/sub_spf_1x_drt_moa-t.jpg
 
Last edited:
their site doesn't list the center dot site for the new spitfire AR. At least i couldn't see it listed. the older ones had a designation of 3 MOA which i've seen many times questioned by others who have owned them online when i was researching them. i also have this scope:
http://www.primaryarms.com/primary-arms-14x-24-illuminated-scope-pa14x-eta-early-may-2016/p/pa14x/

It claims to have center dot that is 2moa. The spitfire AR's center dot is at least as small and dear I say smaller. It COULD be because it's a prism/etched scope and can be slightly deceiving. either way, it's MUCH smaller than a strikefire 2 which i also owned for a short time. THAT is believably a 4MOA red dot-it's huge in my opinion.
 
their site doesn't list the center dot site for the new spitfire AR. At least i couldn't see it listed. the older ones had a designation of 3 MOA which i've seen many times questioned by others who have owned them online when i was researching them. i also have this scope:
http://www.primaryarms.com/primary-arms-14x-24-illuminated-scope-pa14x-eta-early-may-2016/p/pa14x/

It claims to have center dot that is 2moa. The spitfire AR's center dot is at least as small and dear I say smaller. It COULD be because it's a prism/etched scope and can be slightly deceiving. either way, it's MUCH smaller than a strikefire 2 which i also owned for a short time. THAT is believably a 4MOA red dot-it's huge in my opinion.

I agree 4moa is big but where talking fast acquisition of sight and target and looking for Hits on a torso size target... 2moa might be for some tough to pick up quickly.

I will dig around for the NEW spitfire.

The new Spitfire AR has the same ret
http://www.vortexoptics.com/product/vortex-spitfire-ar-1x-prism-scope

The new sparc AR is just a plain 2 MOA dot.

This is why it's good to play with your scope and learn what your reticle can do. Once you know what distance your dots or lines or what have you cover at X distance on Y mag X you can start judging distance better.

So,if your uncertain of your reticle subtension (basically a set distance where your scope reticle dots,crosshairs,hash marks are X size on Y mag) my 8x32 scope is .25 moa dot on 24x , .5 moa on 12x and .190 MOA 32x
 
Last edited:
Maybe that's why they added the rings? I would think if it didn't have the rings it would be a PITA to pickup like you mentioned.
 
Maybe that's why they added the rings? I would think if it didn't have the rings it would be a PITA to pickup like you mentioned.

What I would like to see is the "concept " of their reticle designs. The DRT reticle is exscaping me a little. the inner ring is 44MOA
so basically at 100 yards you could put the upper body inside the inner ring and have a hit on target?
 
What I would like to see is the "concept " of their reticle designs. The DRT reticle is exscaping me a little. the inner ring is 44MOA
so basically at 100 yards you could put the upper body inside the inner ring and have a hit on target?

I will tell you one thing. The first time I looked through a 1/8 moa dot scope I could not see it! took some getting used to. BUT after using my 1/4 MOA dot looking at a standard red dot feels like a basket ball in front of my face
 
I have the spitfire II and the sparc II. I like the spitfire better.
Why do you like the spitfire better? Because it's larger? The reticle?

I'm on the fence trying to decide what I want to get in the $200 -$400 range.

My initial idea was to get a sparc II or AR and then get the flip 3x magnifier...
 
Why do you like the spitfire better? Because it's larger? The reticle?

I'm on the fence trying to decide what I want to get in the $200 -$400 range.

My initial idea was to get a sparc II or AR and then get the flip 3x magnifier...

I've had a sparc first edition, a strikefire 2, an aimpoint pro, a couple of primary arms red dots and a Spitfire AR. the spitfire ar has a better reticle and (for me) the etched design is better than a plain old red dot. If i could only have one it would be hard to decide between the aimpoint pro and the spitfire AR.
 
i also do not understand the idea behind a larger red dot when the newer micro red dots work so well. for example, the sparc vs. spitfire 1x is a no-brainer at least for me...i would take the sparc.
 
Back
Top Bottom