If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Be sure to enter the NES/MFS May Giveaway ***Canik METE SFX***
If people want to be more "carry" they can go shoot IDPA, because if its OK to push people out of a division then why not just push them out of USPSA
No one's pushing anyone anywhere, it's just a matter of which division they choose to shoot in. If you want to make certain mods, then you're in Limited, just as if you want a red dot and comp, welcome to Open.
I know the "tiger teams" are working on a lot of things right now. I haven't heard any rumblings about trigger weight but maybe it will get rammed through like the USPSA BoD did.
By 2015, Production will only allow J-frames.
No one's pushing anyone anywhere, it's just a matter of which division they choose to shoot in. If you want to make certain mods, then you're in Limited, just as if you want a red dot and comp, welcome to Open.
So they guy that has shot with a sub 3lb trigger since Production started is choosing to change division? The Mods have been happening for 10+ years. How is this the shooter choosing divisions? You just forced him out. How can you be OK with that?
I'd assume that it would be relatively easy to bump the trigger back up to 3+ pounds. No change in division necessary. With a Glock, just change a spring or two, no big deal.
It's far from a done deal. At least some of the BoD appear to be learning from the massive backlash. I think there's a solid chance this is reversed before it goes in to effect (Jan 2013).
Of course.Perhaps, but those who are upset about it need to keep up the pressure.
I really don't see this three pound limit as a big deal. It is relatively easy to adjust trigger pull when you are only dealing with a few ounces. Also, I wouldn't expect trigger pull to be a problem at local matches; you would just have to make sure your gun was kosher for the major matches. I think the real problem is that the USPSA BOD has created their own "Production Division" that bears little resemblance to IPSC Production.
This is going to create a equipment race. ....
We will go from a division where all manufacturers have an gun that is competitive down to just a few, It will be just like Limited and Open, where one gun heavily dominates
This is going to create a equipment race. The gun to have will be the DA/SA like the CZ, you will have a nice light pull for all but one of your shots. IPSC has this rule and it pushed out striker fire guns. Then everyone that said, "change a spring, its no big deal", will be bitching that their light weight, heavy trigger pull gun can't compete with the heavier, no recoil, light trigger CZ.
We will go from a division where all manufacturers have an gun that is competitive down to just a few, It will be just like Limited and Open, where one gun heavily dominates
This is going to create a equipment race. The gun to have will be the DA/SA like the CZ, you will have a nice light pull for all but one of your shots. IPSC has this rule and it pushed out striker fire guns. Then everyone that said, "change a spring, its no big deal", will be bitching that their light weight, heavy trigger pull gun can't compete with the heavier, no recoil, light trigger CZ.
We will go from a division where all manufacturers have an gun that is competitive down to just a few, It will be just like Limited and Open, where one gun heavily dominates
Mike- in an open forum- I'm going to say something I may later regret. But I respect you for your dedication and commitment to a division that is one that you haven't really been that active in. If anything you are consistent. I commend you.
Ok- enough of that crap. I was looking at the CZ 75 SP01 TARGET- damn that thing has a 4 lb DA trigger!! The DA is lighter than my Glock's SA pull! So the question to you is: How much real advantage do you think a 2.5 lb trigger pull is compared to a 4 lb trigger pull in a typical local 6 stage match? Now obviously it depends on the shooter and the match, but in general do you think it's big? I hear the "It's the Indian, not the arrow" all the time... and for the most part I think people lose track of the real work that is needed to shoot at the top levels at matches... but heck I have to believe the trigger pull DOES matter... at all levels.
I don't think the trigger pull is that significant, but obviously most people do because it is the first change they make. A better trigger makes shooting easier, but doesn't make you a better shooter. But if a shooters want the light trigger and USPSA has allowed it for 10 years, why take that away from them now, how does that benefit USPSA shooters?
As it sits now, there is balance, have a decent consistent trigger vs a heavy DA first shot, but a great trigger for the rest. Change the rules and the balance goes to DA/SA, making a majority of shooters feel their striker fire guns are not competitive. If you make the pull weight consistent for all shots, then it pushes out the DA/SA as those shooter no longer feel their guns can be competitive.
So if you bump up the trigger weight, what benefit does it provide? What equality does this bring?
Are people thinking that by bumping the trigger pull they will finish higher overall? This is how they will move up the ranks, by taking away from others?
I don't think the trigger pull is that significant, but obviously most people do because it is the first change they make. A better trigger makes shooting easier, but doesn't make you a better shooter. But if a shooters want the light trigger and USPSA has allowed it for 10 years, why take that away from them now, how does that benefit USPSA shooters?
As it sits now, there is balance, have a decent consistent trigger vs a heavy DA first shot, but a great trigger for the rest. Change the rules and the balance goes to DA/SA, making a majority of shooters feel their striker fire guns are not competitive. If you make the pull weight consistent for all shots, then it pushes out the DA/SA as those shooter no longer feel their guns can be competitive.
So if you bump up the trigger weight, what benefit does it provide? What equality does this bring?
Are people thinking that by bumping the trigger pull they will finish higher overall? This is how they will move up the ranks, by taking away from others?
Mike makes a lot of sense here. No matter what Lugnut says about him.
Rob Leatham had a very good post about this topic on the Enos forum. This rule will only hurt striker fired guns while DA/SA guns like the CZ will have the advantage of a light trigger for the second shot and beyond. But no one is discussing the advantage these guns already have being much heavier to help fight recoil. Now they will have both advantages of the better trigger and the weight. They are destroying the one thing this division was invented for which is creating a division where many different guns can be competitive.
Mike also says he didn't think a light trigger makes you a better shooter... so then why all the uproar? To protect the investment of all the fools that paid for fancy trigger work?
Its all about unneeded restrictions that are short sighted, rushed through and are of no benefit. I've had enough of it from the government and don't want to see USPSA go down the same path
USPSA Online Board Meeting Minutes: Details View
Start Time/Date:
End Time/Date:
1/10/12 12:00 AM
1/17/12 11:59 PM
Title:
Production Division change
Date of Motion: 1/10/12 08:10 PM
Closed: 1/17/12 12:00 AM
Submitted byresident
Seconded by: Area1
Status: Posted
Result: Passed
Motion:To remove the 3lb minimum trigger pull limit previously added to Production division specifications.