If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Be sure to enter the NES/MFS May Giveaway ***Canik METE SFX***
Here are the instructions for question 13 on the 4473:
Question 13. State of Residence: The State in which an individual resides. An individual resides in a State if he or she is present in a State with the intention of making a home in that State. If an individual is a member of the Armed Forces on active duty, his or her State of residence also is the State in which his or her permanent duty station is located.
If you are a U.S. citizen with two States of residence, you should list your current residence address in response to question 2 (e.g., if you are buying a firearm while staying at your weekend home in State X, you should list your address in State X in response to question 2.)
Would owning commercial property in NH allow me to purchase and store up there?
Do you need to own a dwelling or is land and paying taxes sufficient for dual residence?
Owning land is not enough according to the ATF website. You must have a residence
land with a tent. define residence further if you disagree
Tent with a mailbox then, LOLI'll go out on a limb and guess that capable of getting mail would help. In the ATF forms they mention physical as well as mailing. You're welcome to give a tent a whirl however.
How where would I go to get a NH state ID with out giving up my Ma drivers Lic?
I have a second home in NH.
Any advice would be appreciated..
ggboy
What an idea. Wonder why nobody thought of that?.... However be aware that acquiring an FFL so that you can buy guns for your personal use is not going to last long. ATF will pull your license. You need to have guns going out as well as coming in.how about 100 guys buy out a hole in the wall FFL
So if I am 65 plus, then what? State office in Keene or Concord?
ggboy
So, if I have a house in FL (spend vacations there) - can I bring my MA-purchased AR there and will it be safe if MA decides to confiscate it?
Not if they issue an order that they must be turned in, and you don't have one to turn in or proof that you got rid of it. Although other states that banned weapons without grandfathering gave a time period to remove them from the state.
But to be safe, what if you found a Florida FFL that you trusted... sold it to him, then immediately bought it back? According to Healy the guidance will not be applied to any rifle legally owned in the state before 7/20/16. So it would be legal for a FFL to sell you the gun, because being preban it's legal in your home state.
You would have a document stating that you sold the firearm... the only legal issue would be not filing an FA-10 afterwords. Is that required for an out of state purchase if the gun isn't brought into the state?
You would have a document stating that you sold the firearm... the only legal issue would be not filing an FA-10 afterwords. Is that required for an out of state purchase if the gun isn't brought into the state?
So, could a bunch of guys and gals buy ownership shares of a cabin in NH with enough land for a range, and declare residency?
Ok then... NES Lodge. Each bedroom is its own condo.
So, could say a bunch of guys and gals buy ownership shares of a cabin in NH with enough land for a range, and declare residency?
huh I thought current use negated land owner liability if the land was open and not posted. ?????? Ya know Use at your own risk
FA10s are only required if the firearm is crossing the border into MA. If someone has a home in FL, purchases a firearm in FL, stores that firearm in FL, and that firearm never crosses the border into MA, then no FA10 would be needed.
I'm trying to think out of the box. To be honest I don't know how condos are set up and run from a legal and liability perspective. It just seems like maybe a low cost way for MA-based NES'ers to establish a second legal residence for purchase and storage in southern-mid NH.
I'm thinking a lodge building with a bunch of owned 10x10 or 10x20s. Maybe there could be some common cooking, dining, bathrooms, entertainment areas, etc.
I assume bylaws could give each condo owner an equal vote for whatever decisions need to be made. Internal condos have certain liabilities and maintenance, and the common areas have another set? A range was a thought, but is very secondary.