Supreme Court ruling blows holes in Springfield’s 30-year-old restrictions on license-to-carry applications

SFC13557

NES Member
Joined
Aug 2, 2019
Messages
4,229
Likes
5,436
Location
Central Ma.
Feedback: 0 / 0 / 0
Very interesting!

"SPRINGFIELD — The impact of the U.S. Supreme Court’s recent landmark decision on firearms is reverberating throughout Massachusetts and in particular in Springfield where the Police Department found its decades-old practice of routinely restricting — or even denying — licenses to carry firearms was suddenly unconstitutional.


“With the new changes from the Supreme Court decision, that’s all gone,” said Deputy Police Chief William Cochrane."

 
Very interesting!

"SPRINGFIELD — The impact of the U.S. Supreme Court’s recent landmark decision on firearms is reverberating throughout Massachusetts and in particular in Springfield where the Police Department found its decades-old practice of routinely restricting — or even denying — licenses to carry firearms was suddenly unconstitutional.


“With the new changes from the Supreme Court decision, that’s all gone,” said Deputy Police Chief William Cochrane."

So they knowingly violated peoples rights for decades. Bunch of Tools. GFY douche nozzles
 
Very interesting!

"SPRINGFIELD — The impact of the U.S. Supreme Court’s recent landmark decision on firearms is reverberating throughout Massachusetts and in particular in Springfield where the Police Department found its decades-old practice of routinely restricting — or even denying — licenses to carry firearms was suddenly unconstitutional.


“With the new changes from the Supreme Court decision, that’s all gone,” said Deputy Police Chief William Cochrane."

That's a shame the restrictions are gone really. Springfield is the world wide model as to how restrictions really reduce crime......wait.....what.....Springfield is the most violent city in MA and ranked in the top 100 most violent cities in America.......oh......never mind.........
 
Statute of limitations? They could likely still be prosecuted, especially doing it willingly.
Naw. Remember the police have the different standard of "clearly established". Until the Bruen ruling, the right wasn't clearly established.

It's a crime for me or you to steal $225,000, but unless police have been explicitly told that it's a crime, they get a pass.

george-costanza-was-that-wrong.gif
 
Back
Top Bottom