If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Be sure to enter the NES/MFS May Giveaway ***Canik METE SFX***
Another complexity is how do the Powers That Be know whether the one you have was purchased from a MA dealer, was purchased out of state, or was purchased out of state long ago and resided in the back of a safe for 15 years.
The big question is, will LTC restrictions apply to stun gun? Will you need an unrestricted LTC for carry?
As of 2014 maybe 2015 there is no more class A or class B restricted LTC licences.
There is only one license to carry but a police department my put a restriction on it which makes no sense.
SECTION 14. Subsection (a) of section 131L of said chapter 140, as appearing in the 2016 Official Edition, is hereby amended by inserting after the first sentence the following sentence:- It shall be unlawful to store or keep any stun gun in any place unless such weapon is secured in a locked container accessible only to the owner or other lawfully authorized user.Bill H.4670
carry / possess by LTC or FID only. Has to be in secure container accessible to LTC/FID holder only
download the pdf 'find' for the word stun
That appears to be the case, although you only need to do the interview every 6 years, now. You'll still need to apply each year for a temporary, non-resident LTC and pay the $100.If I buy one in NH where I live and drive to MA with it, then what? Do I need a non res LTC with the accompanying yearly interview and driving down to that ghetto town to beg to exercise my rights?
What about proper storage? Do all the same rules apply to stun guns as they do firearms? Do they have to be carried concealed? What if my friend agrees to let me zap him, will I still be charged with improper discharge of a firearm? What about blood alcohol content? What about "safe zones"?
There seems to be a huge gray area here. I'm sure this will keep all the liberal lawmakers busy in Massachusetts.
I have no interest in carrying one. If I did It would be treated like a firearm. Just curious about laws.Look Saugus if they want you to have a LTC to have a friggin stun gun then treat it like a gun and you won't have any problems with the po po
I have no interest in carrying one. If I did It would be treated like a firearm. Just curious about laws.
That appears to be the case, although you only need to do the interview every 6 years, now. You'll still need to apply each year for a temporary, non-resident LTC and pay the $100.
• Persons employed by a bank, public utility corporation, a firm engaged in the business of transferring money, or a firm licensed in Massachusetts as a private detective agency, must have the application endorsed by his/her employer by submitting a letter from their employer on company letterhead indicating his or her current employment.
Yes, but I think that that is only for employment. Not sure if that type would be restricted to "on duty use" only. Do I hate paying $100 every year? Yep. But the peace of mind of being legally able to carry while going through MA is worth it.Standard disclaimer (by me) - Unless you qualify for a 2-year non-resident license (works out to $50/yr).
https://www.mass.gov/files/2017-06/Non-resident Application - REVISED 12.2016_0.pdf
SECTION 14. Subsection (a) of section 131L of said chapter 140, as appearing in the 2016 Official Edition, is hereby amended by inserting after the first sentence the following sentence:- It shall be unlawful to store or keep any stun gun in any place unless such weapon is secured in a locked container accessible only to the owner or other lawfully authorized user.
Seems pretty clear from what is written in the new statute.What about proper storage? Do all the same rules apply to stun guns as they do firearms? Do they have to be carried concealed? What if my friend agrees to let me zap him, will I still be charged with improper discharge of a firearm? What about blood alcohol content? What about "safe zones"?
.
Yeah thanks, I figured as much when somebody else let me know that they were classified as a firearmSeems pretty clear from what is written in the new statute.
SECTION 14. Subsection (a) of section 131L of said chapter 140, as appearing in the 2016 Official Edition, is hereby amended by inserting after the first sentence the following sentence:- It shall be unlawful to store or keep any stun gun in any place unless such weapon is secured in a locked container accessible only to the owner or other lawfully authorized user.
I'll buy one! Any thoughts on which is the better model?