Hello everyone.
I have searched and not found the answer so I will post to all my NES'er brothers for assistance.
I currently own a post ban AR, with a 16 barrel that is mass compliant (-- no lug, compliant break/flash suppressor.)
I want to get a SBR AR I am in the process of starting the paperwork.
Can I use my lower receiver for both the 16 inch set up and the SBR set up?
It would save me from spending the $ on another AR Lower.
I was thinking of just using the same lower for 2 different weapon platforms (2 different uppers 1ea 16" and 1ea 7.5-10.5")
I know I would have to have the lower engraved and I am aware of the transport laws that would come into play if I were to transport the SBR across state lines.
But if the weapon was back in the 16 inch mode would I still have to deal with contacting the AFT if I was going across state lines?
I would think yes since it is the lowers that is registered.
I am thinking it would be a lot easier and less hassle in getting a new dedicated lower for the SBR project. Thoughts?
Thanks
Bruce
I have searched and not found the answer so I will post to all my NES'er brothers for assistance.
I currently own a post ban AR, with a 16 barrel that is mass compliant (-- no lug, compliant break/flash suppressor.)
I want to get a SBR AR I am in the process of starting the paperwork.
Can I use my lower receiver for both the 16 inch set up and the SBR set up?
It would save me from spending the $ on another AR Lower.
I was thinking of just using the same lower for 2 different weapon platforms (2 different uppers 1ea 16" and 1ea 7.5-10.5")
I know I would have to have the lower engraved and I am aware of the transport laws that would come into play if I were to transport the SBR across state lines.
But if the weapon was back in the 16 inch mode would I still have to deal with contacting the AFT if I was going across state lines?
I would think yes since it is the lowers that is registered.
I am thinking it would be a lot easier and less hassle in getting a new dedicated lower for the SBR project. Thoughts?
Thanks
Bruce