I've been using Quickload over the past several of years during load research and development. Great tool although there is always a bit a tweaking to powder Ba to dial things in but it's usually within a reasonable error. Say ~+/-100fps or so. And, the interface goes back to the 80's.
Recently I swung back around and found that the Gordon's Reloading Tool to have similar features, a better interface, plus a bunch of additional niceties including things such as auto-tuning for OBT. That's cool. And, it's 'free'ware.
So, I'm playing around by working up some new loads from scratch to compare the tools. Between the two, I find the estimations for this load to be 'ok' vs 'pushing luck' between the two.
Quickload:
Gordon's Reloading Tool:
Fro whatever reason, the GRT show a compressed load producing significantly higher pressures to the maybe not a good idea range and what appears to be slower overall powder burn rates. Or, maybe faster but it doesn't completely burn until later down the barrel? Can't tell at the moment. For the RL-16 powder, GRT claims a farily high level of confidence. It could be that I fat fingered a number in there but I don't know where.
Does anyone have real-world experience between the two tools as to how accurate the powder burn rates / pressures end-up? The muzzle velocities don't seem too far off but the pressure and barrel time....
Recently I swung back around and found that the Gordon's Reloading Tool to have similar features, a better interface, plus a bunch of additional niceties including things such as auto-tuning for OBT. That's cool. And, it's 'free'ware.
So, I'm playing around by working up some new loads from scratch to compare the tools. Between the two, I find the estimations for this load to be 'ok' vs 'pushing luck' between the two.
Quickload:
Gordon's Reloading Tool:
Fro whatever reason, the GRT show a compressed load producing significantly higher pressures to the maybe not a good idea range and what appears to be slower overall powder burn rates. Or, maybe faster but it doesn't completely burn until later down the barrel? Can't tell at the moment. For the RL-16 powder, GRT claims a farily high level of confidence. It could be that I fat fingered a number in there but I don't know where.
Does anyone have real-world experience between the two tools as to how accurate the powder burn rates / pressures end-up? The muzzle velocities don't seem too far off but the pressure and barrel time....
Attachments
Last edited: