Mr. Fleury's trouble began when he allegedly pulled a G27 with a laser and pointed at his friend. He was acquitted on those charges. In the mean time a search warrant was issued to search his house looking for the Glock 27 in question. While looking through his house the police discovered a number guns that were not locked in a safe or having trigger locks. In a separate trial from the assault case, he was convicted of unsafe storage and lost his gun rights.
I know the police went to great efforts to lure him out of his home in order to search it.
It disturbs be that he became a PP (Prohibited Person) due to his storage of guns. Those gun storage laws exist only in Massachusetts and nowhere else in this nation.
I want to know if the warrant and subsequent search of his home could have been avoided.
If he knew that the police wanted to take the G27 into evidence - could Mr. Fleury have simply given it to the police and have avoided the search of his home?
I know the police went to great efforts to lure him out of his home in order to search it.
It disturbs be that he became a PP (Prohibited Person) due to his storage of guns. Those gun storage laws exist only in Massachusetts and nowhere else in this nation.
I want to know if the warrant and subsequent search of his home could have been avoided.
If he knew that the police wanted to take the G27 into evidence - could Mr. Fleury have simply given it to the police and have avoided the search of his home?