Hiltonizer
Banned
What was the $10.00 about?
That was in reference to the CCW permit application at the PD
If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Be sure to enter the NES/MFS May Giveaway ***Canik METE SFX***
What was the $10.00 about?
Mike.....pardon my ignorance.....what is a pp
If the OPs friend is a PP (not sure, don't have enough info) he'd still be violating federal law for even possessing or touching a handgun. Worse yet, if the seller knew that the buyer was a PP, that person could be on the hook, too. Remember that a lot of states won't even blink at punting a case like that off to the feds. (Whether the feds will take it or not is another story, of course. )
-Mike
Oh I understand now. My take was it was a fee to get NICS run to buy a gun. My error. macThat was in reference to the CCW permit application at the PD
prohibited person
in a FTF transfer, you are on the hook if you transferred a weapon to one, hense they are supposed to be "personally known to you"... to not be prohibited, or to have a pistol permit (which is proof they are not prohibited)
Your buddy sounds like he should do himself and others a favor and stay away from firearms. Im sorry, but irresponsible alcohol users and firearms dont mix!
People that have proven themselves to have a problem with alchohol and/or substance abuse are not able to be trusted 100% and are inconsistent at best, sorry but they did it to themselves. They have killed to many brain cells to be cognicent of thier actions. Its sad to say but most likely they will encouter a lifetime full of relapse.
A friend's Dad was a raging alcoholic back in the day. He hasn't had a drink in 15 years and is one of the best people I know.
Do you think anyone who has ever struggled with alcohol abuse should be barred from ever owning firearms?
Well im glad he defeated the odds, there are few occasions were people sober up for good and live a normal life.
If on the other hand a person is out of control to the point of multiple cited DWI and other run ins with the law because of his or her drunken beligerance, then yes i think that person should not own firearms what so ever. Until they can prove they are sober for good.
No, but an alcoholic is responsible for their actions while drinking, and if they did something that makes them a PP, or statutorily DQ'd then they own it.
Sobriety is not a get out of jail free card (so says the guy with 10 years, 9 months and 7 days of sobriety)
maybe I was not clear, if someone screws up while drunk, they own the consequences.
trust me nobody knows that better than I
Let me ask you this, would you be ok with pounding down a six pack or what ever gets you buzzed and then head out to the range? You dont think your gun handling eticate will me impaired? Would you want to shoot next to a person in such condition?
Im glad we feel the same way!
Yes, certain people are a total danger to themself and others once they have gone off the deep end and start developing a record,they have made it difficult for themselves single-handedly. Why cant you comprehend that?