If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Be sure to enter the NES/MFS May Giveaway ***Canik METE SFX***
About the same chances of it happening when Bush had the House and Senate under (R) control and we got absolutely nothing, except it'd be even less than 0 because Obama is still in office.
-Mike
It scares the hell out of me to have the federal government get anywhere near the licensing process.
I might trade a weight limit for a mag limit. Wait... no I wouldn't.... I seem to remember something about a 'cusion' and something else about 'pushing'.Well, maybe not. We want reciprocity and he wants want immigration amnesty.
So the repubs get him to sign the bill and in exchange they offer offer immigration amnesty for all undocumented 21 to 30 years old females. Now that's politics.
I might trade a weight limit for a mag limit. Wait... no I wouldn't.... I seem to remember something about a 'cusion' and something else about 'pushing'.
something has to be done.
It scares the hell out of me to have the federal government get anywhere near the licensing process.
This is a case where "doing something" can cause more problems than it solves, if someone isn't careful. The anti states will still be anti, and they will still treat people like shit, I can guarantee that... and that's what this is really about anyways. With the others unlawful carry first offense is often a misdemeanor, or not even charged, etc. So this is really about NYC and other moonbat shitholes. Those places are not going to stop abusing people's rights anytime soon, even with a new law. They will find out some other way to do it.
-Mike
something has to be done.
Well, maybe not. We want reciprocity and he wants want immigration amnesty.
Look at what they did the the PA woman in NJ, Allen. A single mother made a mistake, didn't know the PA license was only good in PA and they wanted 3 years in jail for her. NJ and NYC will always harass gun owners, it's how they operate.
It scares the hell out of me to have the federal government get anywhere near the licensing process.
We don't need MORE laws and regulations .... we NEED Constitutional Carry enforced in all 50 states!
It scares the hell out of me to have the federal government get anywhere near the licensing process.
they do it for cars so I have no idea why it is not the same argument for guns. only thing is there is the 2A for guns and not that i am a student of the constitution and the bill of rights but I don't recall ever reading about or hearing about an amendment related to driving.
Driving a car is not a right. (at least not explicitly) The terms at which you drive are relatively negotiable and so on. States and feds kind of agree to a compromise of garbage to make it work. A lot of people here would be pissed if the same horse trading was applied to gun rights, and rightly so.
-Mike
States vs Federal. It's balancing act or what is better. With the states you get a patch work of crazy laws and you may not be able to carry outside your state (nobody recognizes Ma LTC). With federal it would be easier to strip the rights away. One Vote one day and gone. Plus as other have said it wouldn't be all clear skys. There would be a huge list of rules, exemptions, and restrictions that would be just as bad as Ma laws.
Actually your MA LTC is recognized by several states. MA recognizes no other states. Do your homework.
Untrue. There are states that recognize other LTCs, but these do not include states that require recognition of their LTCs by MA for reciprocity.nobody recognizes Ma LTC