Montana Bill: Exemption from All Federal Gun Laws!

Jobs are hard to find out here in Montana. We do remain quite defiant to the national government. When Heller was about to be decided part of our Statehood agreement dealt with the right to arms, so there was talk of the ramifications should the decision come in other than how it did. Our Gov. (a Democrat) also was very defiant of the REAL ID act, and refused to change the Montana DL to meet the standards, and eventually won a letter writing contest with the head of DHS.
We do have quite liberal gun laws here- mainly the federal laws are kept in mind. Shall issue- but the process they make you go through varies by county- They had to call 3 references and ask if I was a white supremacist or anything of that sort. More than NH required.
 
I develop software from home. Sounds like it would be a good place to work from home from.
 
Looks like this idea is spreading, you might not have to move to Montana:

Lawmakers in 20 states move to reclaim sovereignty
Obama's $1 trillion deficit-spending 'stimulus plan' seen as last straw
Posted: February 06, 2009
11:50 pm Eastern

By Jerome R. Corsi
© 2009 WorldNetDaily


Oklahoma Republican state Sen. Randy Brogdon
NEW YORK – As the Obama administration attempts to push through Congress a nearly $1 trillion deficit spending plan that is weighted heavily toward advancing typically Democratic-supported social welfare programs, a rebellion against the growing dominance of federal control is beginning to spread at the state level.

So far, eight states have introduced resolutions declaring state sovereignty under the Ninth and Tenth Amendment to the Constitution, including Arizona, Hawaii, Montana, Michigan, Missouri, New Hampshire, Oklahoma and Washington.

Analysts expect that in addition, another 20 states may see similar measures introduced this year, including Alaska, Alabama, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Kansas, Nevada, Maine and Pennsylvania.

"What we are trying to do is to get the U.S. Congress out of the state's business," Oklahoma Republican state Sen. Randy Brogdon told WND.



"Congress is completely out of line spending trillions of dollars over the last 10 years putting the nation into a debt crisis like we've never seen before," Brogdon said, arguing that the Obama stimulus plan is the last straw taxing state patience in the brewing sovereignty dispute.

"This particular 111th Congress is the biggest bunch of over-reachers and underachievers we've ever had in Congress," he said.

"A sixth-grader should realize you can't borrow money to pay off your debt, and that is the Obama administration's answer for a stimulus package," he added.

The Ninth Amendment reads, "The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people."

The Tenth Amendment specifically provides, "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people."

Brogdon, the lead sponsor of the Oklahoma state senate version of the sovereignty bill, has been a strong opponent of extending the plan to build a four-football-fields-wide Trans-Texas Corridor parallel to Interstate-35 to Oklahoma, as WND reported.

Rollback federal authority

The various sovereignty measures moving through state legislatures are designed to reassert state authority through a rollback of federal authority under the powers enumerated in the Constitution, with the states assuming the governance of the non-enumerated powers, as required by the Tenth Amendment.

The state sovereignty measures, aimed largely at the perceived fiscal irresponsibility of Congress in the administrations of Bill Clinton and George W. Bush, have gained momentum with the $1 trillion deficit-spending economic stimulus package the Obama administration is currently pushing through Congress.

Particularly disturbing to many state legislators are the increasing number of "unfunded mandates" that have proliferated in social welfare programs, such as Medicare and Medicaid, in which bills passed by Congress dictate policy to the states without providing funding.

In addition, the various state resolutions include discussion of a wide range of policy areas, including the regulation of firearms sales (Montana) and the demand to issue drivers licenses with technology to embed personal information under the Western Hemisphere Travel Initiative and the Real ID Act (Michigan).

Hawaii's measure calls for a new state constitutional convention to return self-governance, a complaint that traces back to the days it was a U.S. territory, prior to achieving statehood in 1959.

"We are trying to send a message to the federal government that the states are trying to reclaim their sovereignty," Republican Rep. Matt Shea, the lead sponsor of Washington's sovereignty resolution told WND.

"State sovereignty has been eroded in so many areas, it's hard to know where to start," he said. "There are a ton of federal mandates imposed on states, for instance, on education spending and welfare spending."

Shea said the Obama administration's economic stimulus package moving through Congress is a "perfect example."

"In the state of Washington, we have increased state spending 33 percent in the last three years and hired 6,000 new state employees, often using federal mandates as an excuse to grow state government," he said. "We need to return government back down to the people, to keep government as close to the local people as possible."

Shea is a private attorney who serves with the Alliance Defense Fund, a nationwide network of about 1,000 attorneys who work pro-bono. As a counter to the ACLU, the alliance seeks to protect and defend religious liberty, the sanctity of life and traditional family values.

Republican state Rep. Judy Burges, the primary sponsor of the sovereignty resolution in the Arizona House, told WND the federal government "has been trouncing on our constitutional rights."

"The real turning point for me was the Real ID act, which involved both a violation of the Fourth Amendments rights against the illegal searches and seizures and the Tenth Amendment," she said.

Burges told WND she is concerned that the overreaching of federal powers could lead to new legislation aimed at confiscating weapons from citizens or encoding ammunition.

"The Real ID Act was so broadly written that we are afraid that it involves the potential for "mission-creep," that could easily involve confiscation of firearms and violations of the Second Amendment," she said.

Burges said she has been surprised at the number of e-mails she has received in support of the sovereignty measure.

"We are a sovereign state in Arizona, not a branch of the federal government, and we need to be treated as such, she insisted.



Jerome R. Corsi is a staff reporter for WND. He received a Ph.D. from Harvard University in political science in 1972 and has written many books and articles, including his best-sellers "The Obama Nation" and "The Late Great USA." Other books include "Showdown with Nuclear Iran," "Black Gold Stranglehold: The Myth of Scarcity and the Politics of Oil," which he co-authored with WND columnist Craig. R. Smith, and "Atomic Iran."
 
Keep in mind if you moved there and again if Montana succeeded from the so called Union you would be a State Citizen AKA Pre 14th Amendment and or a State National and would no longer be a US citizen or Federal citizen.


Did I miss it, or is there no protection for firearms that were not manufactured in Montana, or that had been previously owned by a U. S. citizen moving to Montana from a different state or commonwealth.
 
Keep in mind if you moved there and again if Montana succeeded from the so called Union you would be a State Citizen AKA Pre 14th Amendment and or a State National and would no longer be a US citizen or Federal citizen.

And thus exempt from paying federal income tax......

I see no bad points here so far.
 
Well yes but keep in mind at this moment there is no law that requires a man to pay a federal income tax.

Its all smoke and mirrors and intimidation on the part of the IRS and Federal Government.

If you dont buy into their system of contracts and dont let yourself be intimidated into it you will be much better off in the long run.

IE you could pull out of their system now and still live right where you are now but it would not be easy.

Everything is based on the commercial side and this means everything.

From start to finish the system has things locked up and into its matrix.

If you work and have a SSN and BC your in their matrix if you use their FRN's your in their matrix.

One must use a disclaimer if you dont want to be considered in their matrix if you use FRN's.

They attempt to trap you into contracts when your born and unless your parents are aware of what they are doing you are locked in to the FED Govs's MATRIX.






And thus exempt from paying federal income tax......

I see no bad points here so far.
 
It is a dupe, but I hope it works for them, and I hope other states follow suit.
 
I believe Montana had in extra clause specific to gun rights that was signed in when they became a state. It directly allows for secession. This gives Montana unique bargaining power on issues like this.
 
I lived in montana for two years and that place is as free as it gets. I hope they keep up the fight.
 
Back
Top Bottom