• If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership  The benefits pay for the membership many times over.

Maryland Gun Owners Vow They Will Not Comply, Gun-Grabbers and Legislators Freak Out

We would never get this up here in mAss. Good for them !!
image3.jpeg_1.jpg
 
It's pretty clear that the Mad Moms and all the other groups Bloomberg funds have zero interest in preventing crime; they simply want to pick a fight and continue the Culture War against self-reliance, as it threatens their end goal, which is Dependence on the State.
 
Maryland has a crew with t shirts, RI has a crew with t shirts, Maine has a crew with t shirts...there just seems to be a lacking of unity among gun owners who’d pack a hearing wearing the same in MA. If there has been, then my mistake. If not, how do we make the same happen in MA?

I do have to say the “We Will Not Comply” message is going to be the winning message of all. I’ve been seeing that as the prevailing thought online.
 
Last edited:
Over 1000 witnesses wearing “We will not COMPLY” with background checks & permits for rifles and shotguns…I work to protect their families too… THANK YOU @MomsDemand @Everytown #ExpectUs#Working4MD for supporting common sense gun legislation pic.twitter.com/ivdNQwdZSB

— Vanessa Atterbeary

No, you don't. You do exactly the opposite - you are trying to turn them into people who cannot protect themselves. You are trying to create victims. Some of us don't need or want your "protection".
 
Just my suggestion for MA and NH.
Hunter orage t-shirts with black print that simply say "No More"
Shows unity.
Promotes asking questions "what do you mean by no more".
Still a clear message to legislatures.
Prevents the lib message that gun owners are just waiting to start an armed conflict.
And might get some of the less "motivated" gun owners to join the visual demonstration.

Of course 2a Pearls also work.
 
Just my suggestion for MA and NH.
Hunter orage t-shirts with black print that simply say "No More"
Shows unity.
Promotes asking questions "what do you mean by no more".
Still a clear message to legislatures.
Prevents the lib message that gun owners are just waiting to start an armed conflict.
And might get some of the less "motivated" gun owners to join the visual demonstration.

Of course 2a Pearls also work.

Problem there is that the goddamn moms demanding all your shit have intentionally co-opted blaze orange. Not saying we shouldn't try to take it back, that's our color after all, but it's going to be tough to do.
 
Just my suggestion for MA and NH.
Hunter orage t-shirts with black print that simply say "No More"
Shows unity.
Promotes asking questions "what do you mean by no more".
Still a clear message to legislatures.
Prevents the lib message that gun owners are just waiting to start an armed conflict.
And might get some of the less "motivated" gun owners to join the visual demonstration.

Of course 2a Pearls also work.
It's needs to be more than "no more". "We will not comply" should be the battle cry. No more nice, or comprise. Nice didn't work for all the other
none right groups. Only loud and together did.
 
Just my suggestion for MA and NH.
Hunter orage t-shirts with black print that simply say "No More"
Shows unity.
Promotes asking questions "what do you mean by no more".
Still a clear message to legislatures.
Prevents the lib message that gun owners are just waiting to start an armed conflict.
And might get some of the less "motivated" gun owners to join the visual demonstration.

Of course 2a Pearls also work.

Sounds like an anti-Halloween shirt. And this isn’t a hunting thing.

The message needs to be right in their face and clear as day. They thrive on gun owners lurking in the shadows. Let them worry that we’re ready for conflict.
 
The NRA article shows you the membership has the balls the leadership refuses to have.

In doing so, some gun rights supporters wore t-shirtswith the words “We Will Not Comply.” The shirts conveyed a powerful message of civil disobedience, making clear that those gun owners would refuse to obey further infringements on their Constitutional rights. The simple message also garnered the support of Wicomico County Sheriff Mike Lewis.

This constitutionally-protected message of resistance proved too much for Leonard. The Maryland Democratic Party Secretary took to social media to express his outrage that these gun owners would express such defiance to the gun control agenda.

The NRAs overall standing would be much higher if they sponsored and took up the message from Maryland.

NRA-ILA | Maryland Democratic Party Secretary Labels Gun Rights Activists “Terrorists,” Calls for Doxing
 
Maryland has a crew with t shirts, RI has a crew with t shirts, Maine has a crew with t shirts...there just seems to be a lacking of unity among gun owners who’d pack a hearing wearing the same in MA. If there has been, then my mistake. If not, how do we make the same happen in MA?

I do have to say the “We Will Not Comply” message is going to be the winning message of all. I’ve been seeing that as the prevailing thought online.

Notice all of those are states where you can buy and possess a firearm without a government permission slip? We are in a sticky situation here in MA. Shirts like that at public hearings here would of course get the same response from the anti gunners looking to find out who they were, except here some percentage of them would then lose their license due to nonsense suitability. Some would be fine if the chief of police didn't care, but how many are going to be willing to roll the dice knowing that they will be targeted and lose their rights?

This won't be high profile loss of rights where you will be a martyr and people might rally behind it, it will be you getting a visit from the PD some morning with a letter revoking your LTC and them walking in to take everything you have. Maybe you win in court sometime later, and maybe you get your stuff out of PD lockup before the bonded thefthouse gets it, but how many will have that luck?

Those other states activists are actually virtually totally safe. They might get hassled by local police if they are known, they might have some people bitch at them about how they are "Threatening" because the premise of not complying implies violence, but they will not lose their ability to even touch a gun. We aren't defeating anything here by voting bloc because numbers. We surely won't stop anything by veiled threat of noncompliance for the same reason, their position is "Great, we would love the photo op of taking guns by force from "Domestic terrorists" please don't comply."

Just my suggestion for MA and NH.
Hunter orage t-shirts with black print that simply say "No More"
Shows unity.
Promotes asking questions "what do you mean by no more".
Still a clear message to legislatures.
Prevents the lib message that gun owners are just waiting to start an armed conflict.
And might get some of the less "motivated" gun owners to join the visual demonstration.

Of course 2a Pearls also work.

No good, they would co-opt it. The media would paint you all as gun control advocates who want "No more" gun violence. By the time they were forced to retract (If ever) the damage would be done and nobody reads the third page story about how they were "Mistaken" and you actually support "The other side" while still not being clear about who or what you support.
 
Notice all of those are states where you can buy and possess a firearm without a government permission slip? We are in a sticky situation here in MA. Shirts like that at public hearings here would of course get the same response from the anti gunners looking to find out who they were, except here some percentage of them would then lose their license due to nonsense suitability. Some would be fine if the chief of police didn't care, but how many are going to be willing to roll the dice knowing that they will be targeted and lose their rights?

This won't be high profile loss of rights where you will be a martyr and people might rally behind it, it will be you getting a visit from the PD some morning with a letter revoking your LTC and them walking in to take everything you have. Maybe you win in court sometime later, and maybe you get your stuff out of PD lockup before the bonded thefthouse gets it, but how many will have that luck?

Those other states activists are actually virtually totally safe. They might get hassled by local police if they are known, they might have some people bitch at them about how they are "Threatening" because the premise of not complying implies violence, but they will not lose their ability to even touch a gun. We aren't defeating anything here by voting bloc because numbers. We surely won't stop anything by veiled threat of noncompliance for the same reason, their position is "Great, we would love the photo op of taking guns by force from "Domestic terrorists" please don't comply."



No good, they would co-opt it. The media would paint you all as gun control advocates who want "No more" gun violence. By the time they were forced to retract (If ever) the damage would be done and nobody reads the third page story about how they were "Mistaken" and you actually support "The other side" while still not being clear about who or what you support.
Thats a stretch. Revoke LTC for protesting? Please explain the danger to the public.
Notice all of those are states where you can buy and possess a firearm without a government permission slip? We are in a sticky situation here in MA. Shirts like that at public hearings here would of course get the same response from the anti gunners looking to find out who they were, except here some percentage of them would then lose their license due to nonsense suitability. Some would be fine if the chief of police didn't care, but how many are going to be willing to roll the dice knowing that they will be targeted and lose their rights?

This won't be high profile loss of rights where you will be a martyr and people might rally behind it, it will be you getting a visit from the PD some morning with a letter revoking your LTC and them walking in to take everything you have. Maybe you win in court sometime later, and maybe you get your stuff out of PD lockup before the bonded thefthouse gets it, but how many will have that luck?

Those other states activists are actually virtually totally safe. They might get hassled by local police if they are known, they might have some people bitch at them about how they are "Threatening" because the premise of not complying implies violence, but they will not lose their ability to even touch a gun. We aren't defeating anything here by voting bloc because numbers. We surely won't stop anything by veiled threat of noncompliance for the same reason, their position is "Great, we would love the photo op of taking guns by force from "Domestic terrorists" please don't comply."



No good, they would co-opt it. The media would paint you all as gun control advocates who want "No more" gun violence. By the time they were forced to retract (If ever) the damage would be done and nobody reads the third page story about how they were "Mistaken" and you actually support "The other side" while still not being clear about who or what you support.
We have already lost. Right here.
 
Thats a stretch. Revoke LTC for protesting? Please explain the danger to the public.

We have already lost. Right here.

Sure, the reasoning is "Because I said so" and 90% of mass courts will accept it. Welcome to reality, you want to say we have lost because you don't like it, but unfortunately that's where we are in this state. You won't get many to support this kind of protest because it won't work in the first place, and will potentially be actively used against us and make things worse.
 
Problem there is that the goddamn moms demanding all your shit have intentionally co-opted blaze orange. Not saying we shouldn't try to take it back, that's our color after all, but it's going to be tough to do.
f*** it, Pink it is then! And the words “we will not comply” will be rainbow colored!
 
LOL, will not comply. Wake me up when it's time to load the AWB compliant rifles and fixed mag pistols and start this non-compliance.
 
Notice all of those are states where you can buy and possess a firearm without a government permission slip? We are in a sticky situation here in MA. Shirts like that at public hearings here would of course get the same response from the anti gunners looking to find out who they were, except here some percentage of them would then lose their license due to nonsense suitability. Some would be fine if the chief of police didn't care, but how many are going to be willing to roll the dice knowing that they will be targeted and lose their rights?


If someone doesn't have enough stones to wear a relatively benign t-shirt out of fear of "suitability" then they're pretty much milquetoast anyways. Not to mention you now have nice grounds for punting to a great federal
court case if the basis of the "suitability" claim is weak.

There's being "MassPrudent" or whatever you want to call it. That's one thing. Not showing up to a peaceful political protest because "your police chief might take the printing on your shirt the wrong way" is like, 110% cuck-type cowardice or something. Does not compute.

-Mike
 
If someone doesn't have enough stones to wear a relatively benign t-shirt out of fear of "suitability" then they're pretty much milquetoast anyways. Not to mention you now have nice grounds for punting to a great federal
court case if the basis of the "suitability" claim is weak.

There's being "MassPrudent" or whatever you want to call it. That's one thing. Not showing up to a peaceful political protest because "your police chief might take the printing on your shirt the wrong way" is like, 110% cuck-type cowardice or something. Does not compute.

-Mike

So you are going to tell me that you would not see people lose their guns for this and have basically zero recourse? Suitability has been weaponized and the mass courts will not help. Federal courts do not appear to have helped there either. The mass courts refuse to use the standard set out in law. I don't like it, but this would be a risk to anyone who is identified with just a phone call to the chief of police in their town.
 
Back
Top Bottom