dcmdon
NES Member
Dear All,
A FEDERAL judge yesterday upheld most of the NY Safe act. But struck down the part about forcing people to download their mags to 7 rounds.
If we are in the same district (not sure if district is the right term) would that decision not apply to CT also?
Its small, but it could be a minor victory for CT gun owners with no effort on their part. If you aren't familiar with this specific part of the new CT statute, here it is.
After 4/4/13, normal capacity magazines can no longer be sold in CT. If you own a normal capacity magazine, you can only load it to capacity in your home or at a shooting range. You can not carry normal capacity magazines outside the home loaded with more than 10 rounds. Even pre-ban mags.
This is a part of the new statute that most CT gun owners ignore because the first offense is a civil infraction, with no criminal penalties.
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/01/01/n...-york-gun-law.html?emc=edit_na_20131231&_r=1&
A FEDERAL judge yesterday upheld most of the NY Safe act. But struck down the part about forcing people to download their mags to 7 rounds.
If we are in the same district (not sure if district is the right term) would that decision not apply to CT also?
Its small, but it could be a minor victory for CT gun owners with no effort on their part. If you aren't familiar with this specific part of the new CT statute, here it is.
After 4/4/13, normal capacity magazines can no longer be sold in CT. If you own a normal capacity magazine, you can only load it to capacity in your home or at a shooting range. You can not carry normal capacity magazines outside the home loaded with more than 10 rounds. Even pre-ban mags.
This is a part of the new statute that most CT gun owners ignore because the first offense is a civil infraction, with no criminal penalties.
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/01/01/n...-york-gun-law.html?emc=edit_na_20131231&_r=1&