I'm always very amused by the indignation of those who get their drawers in a snit over the whole bit about illegal aliens not having constitutional rights. On the surface it all sounds very reasonable. Then however, some of these self-same individuals get all bent out of shape when somebody tries to abridge their 2A rights, saying it isn't about the constitution, it is all about their God-given
natural right . To me, it smacks of hypocrisy...then of course some fella (a learned scholar of Wikipedia and internet forums) will wade in and say "Well it's different...sorta like yelling fire in a crowded theater, abridges the right to free speech which is also considered by many to be
God given natural right . But then some other fella will get his drawers in a snit when people suggest that convicted felons 2A rights be "restored"...now how the heck can any man created law or court, abridge a natural right? Now sure, I get the idea that if someone abuses their right, such as murdering someone with a firearm, they have violated that right (just like falsely yelling fire in a crowded theater) but if Joe Illegal is walking down the street, it seems to me philosophically, that he has just as much of a
natural right to carry a firearm and be able to protect himself as the next fella.
I love it how we interchange natural rights with constitutional rights all the time on this forum, and hide behind one or the other when it suits our purposes. Some of you fellas are somethin' else