I'm probably somewhere in the top 20 in glerk "accumulators" on this forum (that isnt a dealer selling them) and even I think some aspects of their numbering scheme are f***ing stupid.
It evades me why they wouldnt have avoided the numbers commonly confused with calibers, at a bare minimum. It makes it frustrating at retail to have to say "Yeah we have a Glock 45, in Nine Millimeter in stock" etc, etc, ad nauseam. And also Glock 40, Glock 22... like Gaston, you could have thrown us a f***ing bone here.
It's bad enough I have a friend that says "I don't speak glock" when I'm trying to explain something to him. (He is an S&W fanboi and pretty much exclusively buys thier shit) Although smith finally did something equally f***ing stupid and maddening a few years ago. Like do you know how f***ing frustrating it is to explain to people that the gun that used to be called the M&P 9 Compact is NOW CALLED an M&P 9 Subcompact... and its the SAME f***ING GUN?
Worse yet, it makes magazine compatibility difficult at retail if you have a mixture of stock. They should have called their new mid size gun (the one that disrupted the product line ) something like M&P Midsize or M&P Carry (although I am guessing they avoided the latter not wanting to get sued by Sig or something that uses that nomenclature).