If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Headline on CNN website....."house votes to let mentally ill buy guns".......sigh.....
Demonrats are entitled to defend themselves too.
I have a friend that has been hauled away a couple times by the people in white jackets and butterfly nets. He agrees that nobody should allow him a gun. I have personally seen three people have psychotic episodes, all were taken away. It gives you a whole new outlook on this subject.
Looks like they changed their title to "House rolls back Obama gun background check rule"
And from their website:
"CLARIFICATION: The story and headline have been updated to more fully reflect the impact of the rule."
Real headline: "House votes to restore Constitutional rights of senior citizens taken away by BO"Yeah...they did a great job "clarifying" that ruling.... Typical MSM.
Can someone clarify this ruling? I'm trying to find a source other than NPR or huffingtonpost....
I had a liberal friend (who wants to get a gun because Trump is president and thinks the world is going to end) who just posted this on Facebook:
To be clear: Republicans will allow those adjudicated in court as incompetent by reason of mental illness such as schizophrenia to purchase firearms. In other news, the Klan is off of the terror watch list.
Can someone clarify this ruling? I'm trying to find a source other than NPR or huffingtonpost....
I had a liberal friend (who wants to get a gun because Trump is president and thinks the world is going to end) who just posted this on Facebook:
To be clear: Republicans will allow those adjudicated in court as incompetent by reason of mental illness such as schizophrenia to purchase firearms. In other news, the Klan is off of the terror watch list.
The house action to reverse Obama's order simply allows those on the SS rolls that have someone that oversees their finances to once again legally own guns. BO's original order and this congressional pushback have NOTHING to do with mental illness. Len's response a bit earlier is an excellent example of the problem here. Well, there is one more "problem". You have a liberal friend who is utterly ignorant and spreading lies about this action. Those that have been PROPERLY adjudicated with a mental illness are still prohibited from ownership.
Thanks. I just commented on his post and his response was "it is proof that they are mentally ill by definition. This legislation is insane"...
It never had anything to do with mentally ill. My elderly father got caught in the VA version of this Obama trap when it first started. Since my mother always ran the household finances (Dad never had any interest), the VA encouraged him to sign a paper giving mom full control thereby adding a few dollars to his VA pension... never telling him that he would lose his LTC and, therefore, his ability to buy or own a gun in MA.Thanks. I just commented on his post and his response was "it is proof that they are mentally ill by definition. This legislation is insane"...
The problem is the definition of mentally ill.I have a friend that has been hauled away a couple times by the people in white jackets and butterfly nets. He agrees that nobody should allow him a gun. I have personally seen three people have psychotic episodes, all were taken away. It gives you a whole new outlook on this subject.
How did appointing a representative payee add a few dollars to his pension?VA encouraged him to sign a paper giving mom full control thereby adding a few dollars to his VA pension...
I'd post more details but it would only confuse rather than help. The extra money was intended to compensate the assigned representative (in this case, my mother) for time spent managing my father's finances. Regardless of how it was intended to work, the VA simply held it out as a bit more pension money for merely signing a piece of paper. The surprise ugly part came later.How did appointing a representative payee add a few dollars to his pension?
Can you describe the process by which you fought and won?
Can someone clarify this ruling? I'm trying to find a source other than NPR or huffingtonpost....
I had a liberal friend (who wants to get a gun because Trump is president and thinks the world is going to end) who just posted this on Facebook:
To be clear: Republicans will allow those adjudicated in court as incompetent by reason of mental illness such as schizophrenia to purchase firearms. In other news, the Klan is off of the terror watch list.
The problem is the definition of mentally ill.
The SS definition was "anyone who appoints someone to manage their finances is mentally ill and a PP". The problem is many people, particularly the elderly, appoint a trusted family member (often an offspring) to manage their finances and deal with the Social Security Administration. Many do this for convenience absent any mental illness.