Need details. We read this and think it was an idiot that mistook a bike for a deer, which is criminally stupid.
Don't forget, we are ALWAYS painted with a broad brush to look bad. All it says it that she was shot, and she was a biker. So we draw the conclusion that he's an ignorant buffoon, and she's a victim.
May I offer some other scenarios?
1) She was far away and accidentally hit since the hunter didn't check what was behind his target - bad on him.
2) She was slinking through the woods to drop a deuce and wearing camo, and he didn't see her - bad on him, but not TOO bad, and she's kinda dumb too.
Seriously......
3) Above scenario but he shot noise - criminally stupid on his part.
4) She was an anti-hunting nut who was trying to spear him and he shot in self defense - good shoot.
Not a very helpful statement.....
5) He shot at a bird 1/4 miles away and she got lightly peppered with bird shot and freaked out - tough s**t snowflake, no blood no foul.
She was riding a mountain bike, on a mountain bike trail when she was shot. She was not lightly peppered but has suffered a "serious" injury.
If it was scenario 4 or 5, we'll never hear about it again, and hunters will keep a black eye for no reason. I'm believing #5 based on what I'm reading between the lines.